Abstract
The mutation Contrabithorax (Cbx) has played an important part in the recognition of the role that genes of the bithorax complex (BX-C) play in the control of development. Contrabithorax, a dominant mutation which maps in the proximal or Ultrabithorax domain of the BX-C, results in the transformation of structures of the second thoracic segment (T2) into homologous structures of T3 (ref. 1). Recessive mutations and deletions of the same chromosome region have the reverse effect, transforming T3 into T2. This reciprocal relationship between the effects of dominant (gain of function) and recessive (loss of function) mutations suggested that products of the BX-C were both necessary and sufficient to specify the unique developmental pathways of different segments2. Here we report that the original Contrabithorax mutation (Cbx1) and two other dominant mutations in the Ultrabithorax domain, Cbx3 (ref. 3) and Haltere mimic (Hm)3,4, all cause the inappropriate expression in T2 of products from the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) trascription unit. This strongly supports the suggestion that these products execute the functions of the proximal or Ultra-bithorax domain of the BX-C5.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lewis, E. B. Am. Zool. 3, 33–56 (1963).
Lewis, E. B. Nature 276, 565–570 (1978).
Lewis, E. B. in Proc. 9th Congr. int. Soc. dev. Biol. (ed. Burger, M. B.) 269–288 (Liss, New York) (1982).
Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. Carnegie Instn Wash. Publ. No. 627 (1968).
Beachy, P. A., Helfand, S. L. & Hogness, D. S. Nature 313, 545–551 (1985).
Bender, W. et al. Science 221, 23–29 (1983).
Akam, M. E. EMBO J. 2, 2075–2084 (1983).
White, R. A. H. & Wilcox, M. Cell 39, 163–171 (1984).
Morata, G. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 34, 19–31 (1975).
Lewis, E. B. Am. Nat. 89, 73–89 (1955).
White, R. A. H. & Wilcox, M. Nature this issue.
Bender, W., Weiffenbach, B., Karch, F. & Peifer, M. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 50 in press (1985).
Brower, D. L., Lawrence, P. A. & Wilcox, M. Devl Biol. 86, 448–455 (1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
White, R., Akam, M. Contrabithorax mutations cause inappropriate expression of Ultrabithorax products in Drosophila. Nature 318, 567–569 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/318567a0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/318567a0
This article is cited by
-
A Micro-evolutionary Change in Target Binding Sites as a Key Determinant of Ultrabithorax Function in Drosophila
Journal of Molecular Evolution (2023)
-
The genes expression difference between winged and wingless bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi based on transcriptomic data
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
The open for business model of the bithorax complex in Drosophila
Chromosoma (2015)
-
Genome-level identification of targets of Hox protein Ultrabithorax in Drosophila: novel mechanisms for target selection
Scientific Reports (2011)
-
From fruit flies to fallout: Ed Lewis and his science
Journal of Genetics (2004)