Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Contrabithorax mutations cause inappropriate expression of Ultrabithorax products in Drosophila

Abstract

The mutation Contrabithorax (Cbx) has played an important part in the recognition of the role that genes of the bithorax complex (BX-C) play in the control of development. Contrabithorax, a dominant mutation which maps in the proximal or Ultrabithorax domain of the BX-C, results in the transformation of structures of the second thoracic segment (T2) into homologous structures of T3 (ref. 1). Recessive mutations and deletions of the same chromosome region have the reverse effect, transforming T3 into T2. This reciprocal relationship between the effects of dominant (gain of function) and recessive (loss of function) mutations suggested that products of the BX-C were both necessary and sufficient to specify the unique developmental pathways of different segments2. Here we report that the original Contrabithorax mutation (Cbx1) and two other dominant mutations in the Ultrabithorax domain, Cbx3 (ref. 3) and Haltere mimic (Hm)3,4, all cause the inappropriate expression in T2 of products from the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) trascription unit. This strongly supports the suggestion that these products execute the functions of the proximal or Ultra-bithorax domain of the BX-C5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewis, E. B. Am. Zool. 3, 33–56 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, E. B. Nature 276, 565–570 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, E. B. in Proc. 9th Congr. int. Soc. dev. Biol. (ed. Burger, M. B.) 269–288 (Liss, New York) (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. Carnegie Instn Wash. Publ. No. 627 (1968).

  5. Beachy, P. A., Helfand, S. L. & Hogness, D. S. Nature 313, 545–551 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bender, W. et al. Science 221, 23–29 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akam, M. E. EMBO J. 2, 2075–2084 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. White, R. A. H. & Wilcox, M. Cell 39, 163–171 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morata, G. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 34, 19–31 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, E. B. Am. Nat. 89, 73–89 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. White, R. A. H. & Wilcox, M. Nature this issue.

  12. Bender, W., Weiffenbach, B., Karch, F. & Peifer, M. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 50 in press (1985).

  13. Brower, D. L., Lawrence, P. A. & Wilcox, M. Devl Biol. 86, 448–455 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, R., Akam, M. Contrabithorax mutations cause inappropriate expression of Ultrabithorax products in Drosophila. Nature 318, 567–569 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/318567a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/318567a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing