Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. letters
  3. article
An apparent gravitational lens with an image separation of 2.6 arc min
Download PDF
  • Letter
  • Published: 08 May 1986

An apparent gravitational lens with an image separation of 2.6 arc min

  • Edwin L. Turner1,
  • Donald P. Schneider2,
  • Bernard F. Burke3,
  • Jacqueline N. Hewitt3,
  • Glen I. Langston3,
  • James E. Gunn1,
  • Charles R. Lawrence4 &
  • …
  • Maarten Schmidt4 

Nature volume 321, pages 142–144 (1986)Cite this article

  • 115 Accesses

  • 44 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

We report here observations which confirm Paczynski's speculation1 that the previously known2 pair of 19th magnitude quasars 1146 + 111B,C are actually two images of a single object produced by a gravitational lens. The image splitting is 157 arc s, more than 20 times greater than any previously reported3, thus indicating an exceptionally massive lensing object. The data supporting the lens hypothesis are remarkably similar, high signal-to-noise, moderate-resolution spectra of the two components. Both spectra show strong Mg II λ2,798 emission at z = 1.012±0.001 with indistinguishable redshifts (Δv = 126±309 km s−1), widths (FWHM = 64±4 Å) and detailed profile shapes. Both spectra also show broad troughs at λ6,180 and several weaker continuum features. Neither object exhibits the [O II] λ3,727 line which is frequently strong in Mg II emission objects. If the foreground galaxy clustering apparent in a deep R band charge-coupled device (CCD) image proves insufficient to explain the large image splitting, other possibilities such as massive dark objects (for example, a ∼1015 M⊙ black hole) or a cosmic string may be indicated.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

A high black-hole-to-host mass ratio in a lensed AGN in the early Universe

Article 14 February 2024

A dynamical measure of the black hole mass in a quasar 11 billion years ago

Article Open access 29 January 2024

The accretion of a solar mass per day by a 17-billion solar mass black hole

Article 19 February 2024

Article PDF

References

  1. Paczynski, B. Nature 319, 567–568 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arp, H. & Hazard, C. Astrophys. J. 240, 726–736 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Turner, E. L. IAU Symp. No. 117, 209–218 (1986).

  4. Hazard, C., Arp, H. & Morton, D. C. Nature 282, 271–272 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vilenkin, A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 282, L51–L53 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gott, J. R. Astrophys. J. 288, 422–427 (1985).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. DeVeney, J. An Observer's Manual for the Cryogenic Camera (Kitt Peak National Observatory, Tucson, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Young, P., Gunn, J. E., Kristian, J., Oke, J. B. & Westphal, J. A. Astrophys. J. 241, 507–520 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence, C. R. et al. Science 223, 46–49 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paczynski, B. Astrophys. J. 301, 503–516 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider, D. P., Gunn, J. E. & Hoessel, J. G. Astrophys. J. 264, 337–355 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mushotzky, R. F., Serlemitsos, P. J., Smith, B. W., Boldt, E. A. & Holt, S. S. Astrophys. J. 225, 21–39 (1978).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544, USA

    Edwin L. Turner & James E. Gunn

  2. Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, USA

    Donald P. Schneider

  3. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA

    Bernard F. Burke, Jacqueline N. Hewitt & Glen I. Langston

  4. Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA

    Charles R. Lawrence & Maarten Schmidt

Authors
  1. Edwin L. Turner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald P. Schneider
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernard F. Burke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacqueline N. Hewitt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Glen I. Langston
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James E. Gunn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Charles R. Lawrence
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maarten Schmidt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, E., Schneider, D., Burke, B. et al. An apparent gravitational lens with an image separation of 2.6 arc min. Nature 321, 142–144 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321142a0

Download citation

  • Received: 24 March 1986

  • Accepted: 10 April 1986

  • Issue date: 08 May 1986

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/321142a0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Space fabric wrinkles: history of observational searches for exotic structures in the Universe

    • Mikhail V. Sazhin
    • Olga S. Sazhina

    La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (2021)

  • Lensing by exotic objects

    • Alexander Zakharov

    General Relativity and Gravitation (2010)

  • A small mass, large image separation gravitational lens model

    • Robert J. Nemiroff

    Astrophysics and Space Science (1988)

  • Marginal gravitational lenses of large separation: probing superclusters

    • Israel Kovner

    Nature (1987)

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Research Analysis
  • Careers
  • Books & Culture
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Current issue
  • Browse issues
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Staff
  • About the Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Our publishing models
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • History of Nature
  • Send a news tip

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature (Nature)

ISSN 1476-4687 (online)

ISSN 0028-0836 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing