Quantifying receptor autoradiography is a useful tool, and one becoming increasingly popular, but potential errors exist in the interpretation of results.
Enjoying our latest content?
Log in or create an account to continue
- Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team
- Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research
or
References
Rogers, A. W. Techniques of Autoradiography, 3rd edn (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1979).
Stumpf, W.E. & Roth, L.J. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 14, 274–287 (1966).
Young, W.S. & Kuhar, M.J. Brain Res. 179, 255–270 (1979).
Unnerstall, J.R. et al. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 218, 797–804, (1981).
Palacios, J.M. in CVS Receptors from Molecular Pharmacology to Behaviour (eds Mandel, P. & DeFeudis, F.V.) 455–463 (Raven, New York, 1983).
Kuhar, M.J. & Unnerstall, J.R. Trends Neurosci. 8, 49–53 (1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, M., Davenport, A. & Clark, C. Quantitative receptor autoradiography. Nature 324, 493–494 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/324493a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/324493a0
This article is cited by
-
Quantitative receptor autoradiography
Nature (1987)
