Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is PSR1957 + 20 eclipsed by a comet, magnetosphere or particulate cloud?

Abstract

The extraordinary eclipsing binary pulsar PSR1957 + 20 is in eclipse over eight per cent of its orbit1. This is more than twice the extent of the companion's Roche lobe, the maximum stable synchronous configuration. A possible explanation2 for the large eclipse is that it is caused by a plasma wind driven from the companion and forming a comet-like tail3. But an ionized cometary tail implies a refractive eclipse, which would produce large variations in pulse arrival times; this is inconsistent with the small time delays observed. Here we suggest two alternative explanations. One possibility is that the companion has a typical white-dwarf magnetic field ( 105 gauss), and that the eclipse is then due to the plasma-filled magnetosphere which is confined and blown back sharply by the pulsar wind, with the time delays produced by a much less dense tail. In the other limit of negligible magnetization of the companion, an eclipse could be caused by a particulate cloud (comprising particles of size 10 cm) which should form about the companion. We assume that the companion is the remnant of an evolved companion star that is now being excited by the 622-Hz pulsar radiation. Such excitation could either supply plasma to the magnetosphere (for the magnetized case) or pull off neutral gas and deposit it in the vicinity to sustain a particulate cloud (for the non-magnetized case). Near-infrared radiation from this variable system might test the cloud hypothesis, whereas time delays in a magnetized tail suggest radio-frequency polarization tests for the magnetosphere model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fruchter, A. S., Stinebring, D. R. & Taylor, J. H. Nature 333, 237–239 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailyn, C. Nature 334, 298 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Phinney, E. S., Evans, C. R., Blandford, R. D. & Kulkarni, S. R. Nature 333, 832–834 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowers, R. & Deeming, T. Astrophysics 1 Stars 260 (Jones and Bartlett, Boston, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Paradijs, J. et al. Nature 334, 684–686 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fruchter, A. S., Gunn, J. E., Lauer, T. R. & Dressler, A. Nature 334, 686–689 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michel, F. Is PSR1957 + 20 eclipsed by a comet, magnetosphere or particulate cloud?. Nature 337, 236–238 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/337236a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/337236a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing