Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Luminosity segregation as a constraint on the theory of biased galaxy formation

Abstract

THE theory of biased galaxy formation with cold dark matter (CDM) is presently the most successful attempt to reproduce the distribution of galaxies in the Universe1–6, permitting a reconciliation of the observed low value of the cosmological density parameter ω0 ≤ 0.2 with the value of unity predicted by inflation. Specific tests of the bias hypothesis, namely that galaxies are more clustered than the mass1,2,4, however, have not yet led to definitive conclusions. Here we show that a systematic luminosity segregation effect in the clustering of galaxies is expected and provides an unambiguous test of the biased galaxy formation theory. We examine in detail how the clustering of galaxies correlates with their luminosity, using different biased models and numerical simulations5–7. We find that a strong effect is expected at luminosities larger than L* the characteristic luminosity of galaxies and that the amplitude of the predicted effect at these luminosities agrees with observations8. At luminosities fainter than L* however, strong limits have been put on this segregation effect9. These limits are incompatible with any biased CDM theory in which the bias parameter bb for bright galaxies is greater than 1.5 on large scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. Astrophys. J. 292, 371–394 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rees, M. J. Mon. Not R. astr. Soc. 213, 75p–81p (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dekel, A. & Silk, J. Astrophys. J. 303, 39–55 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dekel, A. & Rees, M. J. Nature 326, 455–462 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Efstathiou, G. & Davis, M. Nature 317, 595–597 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. White, S. D. M., Davis, M., Efstathiou, G. & Frenk, C. S. Nature 330, 451–453 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Davis, M. & Efstathiou, G. Astrophys. J. 327, 507–525 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton, A. J. S. Astrophys. J. 331, L59–L62 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alimi, J.-M., Valls-Gabaud, D. & Blanchard, A. Astr. Astrophys. 206, L11–L14 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blumenthal, G. R., Faber, S. M., Primack, J. R. & Rees, M. J. Nature 311, 517–525 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaeffer, R. Astr. Astrophys. 180, L5–L8 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. West, M. J. & Richstone, D. O. Astrophys. J. 335, 532–541 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N. & Szalay, A. S. Astrophys. J. 304, 15–61 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, M., Huchra, J., Latham, D. W. & Tonry, J. Astrophys. J. 253, 423–445 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Einasto, J., Klypin, A. & Saar, E. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 219, 457–478 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillipps, S. & Shanks, T. Mon. Not. R astr. Soc. 229, 621–626 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Einasto, M. Mon. Not. R astr. Soc. 234, 37–50 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, M. & Djorgovski, S. Astrophys. J. 299, 15–20 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bothun, G. D., Beers, T. G., Mould, J. R. & Huchra, J. P. Astrophys. J. 308, 510–529 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tully, B. Astr. J. 96, 73–80 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis, M., Meiksin, A., Strauss, M. A., Da Costa, L. N. & Yahil, A. Astrophys. J. 333, L9–L12 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, M., Tully, B. & White, S. D. M. Astrophys. J. 333, L45–L49 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peacock, J. A. & Heavens, A. F. Mon. Not. R astr. Soc. 217, 805–820 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. White, S. D. M. in The Early Universe (eds Unruh, W. G. & Semenoff, G. W.) 239–260 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Carlberg, R. G. & Couchman, H. M. P. Astrophys. J. 340, 47–68 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis, M. & Peebles, P. J. E. Astrophys. J. 267, 465–482 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Press, W. H. & Schechter, P. Astrophys. J. 187, 425–438 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schaeffer, R. & Silk, J. Astrophys. J. 292, 319–329 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanchard, A. & Alimi, J.-M. Astr. Astrophys. 203, L1–L4 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bahcall, N. A. & Soneira, R. M. Astrophys. J. 270, 20–38 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lynden-Bell, D. et al. Astrophys. J. 326, 50–62 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sutherland, W. Mon. Not R astr. Soc. 234, 159–172 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valls-Gabaud, D., Alimi, JM. & Blanchard, A. Luminosity segregation as a constraint on the theory of biased galaxy formation. Nature 341, 215–217 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/341215a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/341215a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing