Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Agent Orange controversy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Steele, E.J., Bellett, A.J.D., McCullagh, P.J. & Selinger, B. (eds), 1989. Evatt Revisited: interpretation of scientific evidence. Proceedings of a conference which reexamined the findings of the Royal Commission on the use and effects of chemical agents on Australian personnel in Vietnam (Centre for Human Aspects of Science and Technology, University of Sydney, 1989).

  2. Royal Commission on the use and effects of chemical agents on Australian personnel in Vietnam. Final Report (The Hon. Mr. Justice Phillip Evatt, Commissioner). (Australian Government Printing Office, Canberra, 1985).

  3. Axelson, O. & Hardell, L. Med. J. Aust. 144, 612 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pollak, J.K. Med. J. Aust. 144, 612 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martin, B. Aust. Soc. 5 (11), 25 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hardell, L. & Axelson, O. Med. J. Aust. 145, 298 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Humphrey, G.F. Aust. Soc. 6 (3), 46 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bellett, A.J.D., McCullagh, P.J., Selinger, B. & Steele, E.J. in Evatt Revisited (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Working Group on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. Some Halogenated Hydrocarbons and Pesticide Exposures (Lyon, 1986).

  10. Albenese, R.A. United States Air Force Personnel and Exposure to Agent Orange. Interim report for period March 1984 — February 1988 (USAF School of Aero space Medicine, Division, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Field, B. & Kerr, C. J. med. Genet. 25, 819 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Axelson, O., Persson, B. & Hardell, L. in Evatt Revisited (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Woods, J.S., Polissar, L., Severson, R.K., Heuser, L.S. & Kulander, B.G. J. natn. Cancer. Inst. 78, 899 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoar, S.K. et al. J. Am. med. Ass. 256, 1141 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buckley, J.D. et al. Cancer Res. 49, 4030 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blakley, P.M., Kim, J.S. & Firneisz, G.D. Teratology 39, 237 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Armstrong, B.K. Med. J. Aust. 144, 284 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Young, A.L. & Reggiani, G.M. (eds) Agent Orange and its Associated Dioxin: Assessment of a Controversy (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988).

  19. Hay, A. Nature 340, 353 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Donovan, J.W. in Evatt Revisited (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacPhee, D. & Hall, W. in Evatt Revisited (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  22. McCulloch, J. The Politics of Agent Orange. The Australian Experience. (Heinemann, Richmond, Victoria, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BELLETT, A. Agent Orange controversy. Nature 343, 586 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/343586a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/343586a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing