Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Need for public debate about fertility treatments

Manipulations of the mitochondrial germ line must be openly debated and followed up.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Barritt, J. A., Brenner, C. A., Malter, H. E. & Cohen, J. J. Hum. Reprod. 16, 513 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, J., Scott, R., Schimmel, T., Levron, J. & Willadsen, S. Lancet 350, 186 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barritt, J. A., Brenner, C. A., Willadsen, S. & Cohen, J. J. Hum. Reprod. 15, 207 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parens, E. & Juengst, E. Science 292, 397 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thorburn, D. R., Dahl, H.-H. M. & Singh, K. K. Mitochondrion 1, 123 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naviaux, R., Singh, K. Need for public debate about fertility treatments. Nature 413, 347 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35096737

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35096737

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing