Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparison of two methods for measuring dissolved organic carbon in sea water

Abstract

RECENT measurements1 of the amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in sea water using a high-temperature catalytic oxidation (HTCO) method have generated intense interest because they indicated concentrations several times greater than those obtained from conventional wet chemical oxidation (WCO) methods2–4. As dissolved organic matter in the oceans represents one of the major pools of organic matter in the biosphere5,6, these findings of 'new' DOC have prompted important revisions to models of the oceanic carbon cycle7–9. A satisfactory explanation for the origin of the 'new' DOC, however, which seems to be chemically refractory1, biologically labile10 and of high molecular mass1, has not been forthcoming. Here we present a comparison of measurements of seawater DOC using the HTCO and WCO methods. We obtain fairly good agreement between the two methods, with the HTCO results being considerably lower than those reported previously1. Our data suggest that the WCO technique may not fail to detect so much DOC as had been previously supposed, and that any carbon that is missed by this method may be in the low- rather than the high-molecular-mass fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sugimura, Y. & Suzuki, Y. Mar. Chem. 24, 105–131 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Menzel, D. W. & Vaccaro, R. F. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9, 138–142 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strickland, J. D. H. & Parsons, T. R. in A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis, Fish. Res. Board Can. Bull. 167, 310 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharp, J. H. Mar. Chem. 1, 211–229 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, P. M. in Organic Compounds in Aquatic Environments (eds Faust, S. J. & Hunter, J. V.) 145–164 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mopper, K. & Degens, E. T. in The Global Carbon Cycle (eds Bolin, B. et al.) 293–316 (Wiley, New York. 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Legendre, L. & Gosselin, M. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34, 1374–1380 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toggweiler, J. R. Nature 347, 122–123 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bascastow, R. & Maier-Reimer, E. Glob. biogeochem. Cycles 5, 71–85 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirchman, D. L., Suzuki, Y., Garside, C. & Ducklow, H. W. Nature 352, 612–614 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogura, N. Mar. Biol. 24, 305–312 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlson, D. J., Brann, M. L., Mague, T. H. & Mayer, L. M. Mar. Chem. 16, 155–171 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gershey, R. M., Mackinnon, M. D., Williams, P. J. leB. & Moore, R. M. Mar. Chem. 7, 289–306 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mackinnon, M. D. in Marine Organic Chemistry (eds Duursma, E. K. & Dawson, R.) 415–443 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barber, R. T. Nature 220, 274–275 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogura, N. Mar. Chem. 5, 535–549 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams, P. M. & Druffel, E. M. Nature 330, 246–248 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kieber, D. J., McDaniel, J. & Mopper, K. Nature 341, 637–639 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kieber, R. J., Zhou, X. & Mopper, K. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35, 1503–1515 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mopper, K. et al. Nature 353, 60–62 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogawa, H., Ogura, N. Comparison of two methods for measuring dissolved organic carbon in sea water. Nature 356, 696–698 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/356696a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/356696a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing