Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis

Abstract

TO calculate the depth difference between a pair of points on a three-dimensional surface from binocular disparities, it is necessary to know the absolute distance to the surface1,2. Traditionally, it has been assumed that this information is derived from non-visual sources such as the vergence angle of the eyes3,4. It has been shown5,6 that the horizontal gradient of vertical disparity between the images in the two eyes also contains information about the fixation distance7–9. Recent results10,11, however, indicated that manipulations of the vertical disparity gradient have no effect on either the perceived shape or the perceived depth of surfaces defined by horizontal disparities. Following the reasoning of Longuet-Higgins12 and Tyler13, we suggest that vertical disparities are best understood as a consequence of perspective viewing from two different vantage points and the results we report here show that the human visual system is able to exploit vertical disparities and use them to scale the perceived depth and size of stereoscopic surfaces, if the field of view is sufficiently large.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ono, H. & Comerford, J. Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception (ed. Epstein, W.) 91–128 (Wiley, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, P. O. Proc. R. Soc. B237, 445–469 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Helmholtz, H. von Treatise on Ophysiological Ptics Vol. III (Dover, New York, 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Foley, J. M. Psychol. Rev. 87, 411–434 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Longuet-Higgins, H. C. Nature 297, 376–378 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayhew, J. E. W. Perception 11, 387–483 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koenderink, J. J. & van Doorn, A. J. Biol. Cybernetics 21, 29–35 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Porrill, J. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Frisby, J. Frontiers of Visual Science: Proc. 1985 Symp. 90–108 (National Academy, Washington. 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Petrov, A. P. Vision Res. 20, 409–416 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cumming, B. G., Johnston, E. B. & Parker, A. J. Nature 349, 411–413 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sobel, E. C. & Collett, T. S. Proc. R. Soc B244, 87–90 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. Nature 293, 133–135 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tyler, C. W. Binocular Vision (ed. Regan, D.) 19–37 (Macmillan, London, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howard, I. P. Psychon. Monogr. 3, suppl 201–219 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frisby, J. P. Nature 307, 592–593 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stenton, S. P., Frisby, J. P. & Mayhew, J. E. W. Nature 309, 622–623 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33, 1333 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers, B. J., Bradshaw, M. F., Glennerster, A. & De Bruyn, B. Perception 21, (suppl.), 18 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, B., Bradshaw, M. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis . Nature 361, 253–255 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/361253a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/361253a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing