Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Constraints on North American plate velocity from the Yellowstone hotspot deformation field

Abstract

OCEANIC hotspot tracks generally indicate that the mantle plumes that give rise to them are fixed in position (relative to a lower-mantle reference frame) for timespans of 100 Myr1–3. It has not been clear whether continental hotspots are equally stable; for example, there is evidence that the velocity of the Yellowstone hotspot has been quite irregular with respect to the North Ameri-can plate over the past 16 Myr4–7, but measurements of its velocity based on caldera locations have been too uncertain and irregular to be definitive. Here I describe a new method of obtaining the plume velocity, which uses the broader lithospheric effects of the hotspot rather than the locations of individual calderas. For the past 10 Myr, the results indicate a constant North American plate velocity of 2.2 cm yr-1, which agrees with independent estimates from global plate motion inversions8,9. This velocity is considerably lower than previous estimates obtained from caldera locations, and clearly differs from the much higher (but less well constrained) velocities of the previous 6 Myr (refs 5, 7).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgan, W. J. Nature 230, 42–43 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Duncan, R. A. Tectonophysics 74, 29–42 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan, W. J. Tectonophysics 94, 123–139 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, R. L., Leeman, W. P. & Malde, H. E. Am. J. Sci. 275, 225–251 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pollitz, F. F. Tectonics 7, 711–726 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodgers, D. W., Hackett, W. R. & Ore, H. T. Geology 18, 1138–1141 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierce, K. L. & Morgan, L. A. in Regional Geology of Eastern Idaho and Western Wyoming (eds Link, P. K., Kuntz, M. A. & Platt, L. B.) 1–53 (Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 179, Boulder, Colorado, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMet, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F. & Stein, S. Geophys. J. Int. 101, 425–478 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gripp, A. E. & Gordon, R. G. Geophys. Res. Let. 17, 1109–1112 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suppe, J., Powell, C. & Berry, R. Am. J. Sci. 275-A, 397–436 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, R. B. & Arabasz, W. J. in Neotectonics of North America (eds Slemmons, D. B., Engdahl, E. R., Zoback, M. D. & Blackwell, D. D.) 185–228 (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geist, D. & Richards, M. Geology 21, 789–792 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zoback, M. L. & Thompson, G. A. Geology 6, 111–116 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott, W. E., Pierce, K. L. & Hait, M. H. Jr. Bull, seism. Soc. Am. 75, 1053–1066 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anders, M. H., Geissman, J. W., Piety, L. A. & Sullivan, J. T. J. geophys. Res. 94, 1589–1621 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anders, M. H. & Sleep, N. H. J. geophys. Res. 9, 15379–15393 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anders, M. H., Spiegelman, M., Rodgers, D. W. & Hagstrum, J. T. Tectonics 12, 1451–1459 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dueker, K. Humphreys, E. Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1327–1330 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton, W. & Myers, W. B. Rev. Geophys. 4, 509–549 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Christiansen, R. L. & McKee, E. H. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 152, 283–311 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parsons, T., Thompson, G. A. & Sleep, N. H. Geology 22, 83–86 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. White, R. S. & McKenzie, D. P. J. geophys. Res. 94, 7685–7730 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Richards, M. A., Duncan, R. A. & Courtillot, V. E. Science 246, 103–107 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Duncan, R. A. & Richards, M. A. Rev. Geophys. 29, 31–50 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Simpson, D. W. & Anders, M. H. GSA Today 2, 118–121 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fritz, W. J. & Sears, J. W. Geology 21, 427–430 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pelton, J. R. & Smith, R. B. Science 206, 1179–1182 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anders, M. Constraints on North American plate velocity from the Yellowstone hotspot deformation field. Nature 369, 53–55 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/369053a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/369053a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing