Abstract
Our analysis showed that the cranial strength of Allosaurus far exceeded the stresses that could have been generated by its jaw-closing muscles, and we suggested that this disparity might be explained if this dinosaur had adopted a 'slash-and-tear' mode of attack. Frazzetta and Kardong raise three points in criticism of this suggested mode of feeding.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dodson, P., Behrensmeyer, A. K., Baker, R. T. & McIntosh, J. S. Paleobiology 6, 208–232 (1980).
Farlow, J. O., Brinkman, D. L., Abler, W. L. & Currie, P. J. Mod. Geol. 16, 161–198 (1991).
Abler, W. L. Paleobiology 18, 161–183 (1992).
Rayfield, E. J. Cranial Form and Function in a Large theropod Dinosaur: A Study Using Finite Element Analysis. Thesis, Univ. Cambridge (2001).
Busbey, A. B. in Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology (ed. Thomason, J. J.) 173–192 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rayfield, E., Norman, D. & Upchurch, P. Prey attack by a large theropod dinosaur. Nature 416, 388 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/416388a
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/416388a
