Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Indonesian earthquake

Earthquake risk from co-seismic stress

Last year's Indonesian earthquake has increased seismic hazard in the region.

Abstract

Following the massive loss of life caused by the Sumatra–Andaman earthquake in Indonesia and its tsunami, the possibility of a triggered earthquake on the contiguous Sunda trench subduction zone is a real concern. We have calculated the distributions of co-seismic stress on this zone, as well as on the neighbouring, vertical strike–slip Sumatra fault, and find an increase in stress on both structures that significantly boosts the already considerable earthquake hazard posed by them. In particular, the increased potential for a large subduction-zone event in this region, with the concomitant risk of another tsunami, makes the need for a tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean all the more urgent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Plate tectonics of the Sumatra region.
Figure 2: The Sumatran subduction zones with the overlying plates removed.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rydelek, P. A. & Sacks, I. S. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 206, 289–296 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein, R. S., Barka, A. A. & Dieterich, J. H. Geophys. J. Int. 128, 594–604 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nalbant, S. S., Hubert, A. & King, G. C. P. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24469–24486 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hubert-Ferrari, A. et al. Nature 404, 269–272 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zachariasen, J., Sieh, K., Taylor, F. W., Edwards, R. L. & Hantoro, W. S. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 895–919 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ji, C. http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_slav_ff.html (2005).

  7. Pollitz, F. F. & Sacks, I. S. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87, 1–10 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Newcomb, K. R. & McCann, W. R. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 421–439 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Genrich, J. F. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 28327–28341 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein, S. & Okal, E. Nature (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John McCloskey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCloskey, J., Nalbant, S. & Steacy, S. Earthquake risk from co-seismic stress. Nature 434, 291 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/434291a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/434291a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing