Our persistence in placing ourselves at the top of the Great Chain of Being suggests we have some deep psychological need to see ourselves as the culmination of creation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Teleological pitfalls in reading evolutionary trees and ways to avoid them
Evolution: Education and Outreach Open Access 29 November 2019
-
Teaching Tree-Thinking to Undergraduate Biology Students
Evolution: Education and Outreach Open Access 27 July 2010
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nee, S. The great chain of being. Nature 435, 429 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/435429a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/435429a
This article is cited by
-
Teleological pitfalls in reading evolutionary trees and ways to avoid them
Evolution: Education and Outreach (2019)
-
Classifying Life, Reconstructing History and Teaching Diversity: Philosophical Issues in the Teaching of Biological Systematics and Biodiversity
Science & Education (2013)
-
Two Minds Vs. Two Philosophies: Mind Perception Defines Morality and Dissolves the Debate Between Deontology and Utilitarianism
Review of Philosophy and Psychology (2012)
-
Wandering drunks and general lawlessness in biology: does diversity and complexity tend to increase in evolutionary systems?
Biology & Philosophy (2011)
-
Teaching Tree-Thinking to Undergraduate Biology Students
Evolution: Education and Outreach (2010)
