The suggestion that women are not advancing in science because of innate inability is being taken seriously by some high-profile academics. Ben A. Barres explains what is wrong with the hypothesis.
Enjoying our latest content?
Log in or create an account to continue
- Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team
- Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research
or
References
Summers, L. Letter to the Faculty Regarding NBER Remarks http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/summers/2005/facletter.html (2005).
The Science of Gender and Science. Pinker vs. Spelke: A Debate http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html (2005).
Lawrence, P. A. PLoS Biol. 4, 13–15 (2006).
Baron-Cohen, S. The Essential Difference: Men, Women, and the Extreme Male Brain (Allen Lane, London, 2003).
Mansfield, H. Manliness (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 2006).
Gould, S. J. The Mismeasure of Man (W. W. Norton & Co, New York, 1996).
Steele, C. M. Am. Psychol. 52, 613–629 (1997).
Spelke, E. S. Am. Psychol. 60, 950–958 (2005).
Leahey, E. & Guo, G. Soc. Forces 80.2, 713–732 (2001).
Xie, Y. & Shauman, K. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003).
Valian, V. Why So Slow? (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998).
Wennerås, C. & Wold, A. Nature 387, 341–343 (1997).
Rhode, D. L. Speaking of Sex: The Denial of Gender Inequality (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).
Carnes, M. et al. J. Womens Health 14, 684–691 (2005).
Gneezy, U., Niederle, M. & Rustichini, A. Q. J. Econ. 18, 1049–1074 (2003).
Fels, A. Necessary Dreams (Pantheon Press, New York, 2004).
Pinker, S. New Repub. 15 (14 Feb, 2005).
Moody, J. Faculty Diversity: Problems and Solutions (Taylor and Francis, New York, 2004).
Petsko, G. A. Genome Biol. 6, 1–3 (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barres, B. Does gender matter?. Nature 442, 133–136 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/442133a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/442133a
This article is cited by
-
Gender equity: toward redefining values
Nature Cell Biology (2024)
-
Community voices: policy proposals to promote inclusion in academia through the lens of women in science
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Decision Theoretic Model of the Productivity Gap
Erkenntnis (2017)
-
Sex stereotypes influence adults’ perception of babies’ cries
BMC Psychology (2016)
-
Fold-back perineoscrotal flap plus penile inversion vaginoplasty for male-to-female gender reassignment surgery in circumcised subjects
European Journal of Plastic Surgery (2015)
phluisma
https://goo.gl/1N6dqM
or this https://youtu.be/2sblNk2aPzE and https://youtu.be/Me3okdm0C1M
Scott Voolker
I was looking forward to reading a well-argued essay that outlines the available evidence that women are just as talented when it comes to the sciences as men. Instead, we got an article that presents virtually no evidence, takes a bizarre turn into attacking freedom of speech itself, and finally finishes with standard boilerplate feminist talking points.