Nature catches up with some past fraud investigations — and finds that, whether researchers are found to be guilty or innocent, the wounds are slow to heal.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Misconduct? It's all academic...
Preprint analysis quantifies scientific plagiarism
Verdict: Hwang's human stem cells were all fakes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Odling-Smee, L., Giles, J., Fuyuno, I. et al. Where are they now?. Nature 445, 244–245 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/445244a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/445244a
This article is cited by
-
Conduct and Correctness in Mathematical Publishing
Publishing Research Quarterly (2022)
-
Should not all authors of a research publication be given equal credit? The hurdles and possible ways out
Indian Journal of Surgery (2022)
-
Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication
Scientometrics (2008)
