Key Points
-
The incidence of glove perforation during routine dental treatment of HIV positive patients was low. There was no penetrating injuries or visible skin contamination.
-
The decision whether to double glove is influenced by several factors.
-
There is little evidence to support double gloving, or the use of a glove perforation system during the dental treatment of HIV positive patients.
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of glove perforation when double gloved or single gloved during the routine treatment of HIV-positive patients. In addition, a glove perforation indication system based on a double gloving technique was assessed.
Design Prospective, randomised and open study of glove perforation.
Methods 138 consecutive HIV-positive patients underwent routine dental treatment by senior dental staff and dental hygienists in a teaching hospital. Staff wore either single gloves (Regent Biogel D or standard surgical gloves) or double gloves (Regent 'Reveal' perforation indication system or standard surgical gloves). A subjective assessment of glove comfort, sensitivity and ease of donning was made using a visual analogue scale.
Results The incidence of glove perforation/procedure was low, 2.9%. There were no skin penetrating injuries, visible exposure to body fluids or unnoticed perforations. Double gloving was subjectively less comfortable and sensitive than single gloving (P < 0.0001). The glove perforation indication system did not increase the detection of intra-operative perforations.
Conclusions There is unlikely to be any significant benefit from the use of a double gloving technique or perforation indication system during the routine dental treatment of HIV-positive patients.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Porter S R Control of cross-infection. In Scully C, Samaranayake L P . Clinical virology in dentistry and oral medicine. 378–423 Cambridge: CUP, 1992.
Handfield-Jones S E Latex allergy in health-care workers in an English district general hospital. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 271–276.
Kujala V M, Reijula K E Glove-induced dermal and respitory symptoms among health care wokers in one Finnish hospital. Am J Indust Med 1995; 28: 89.
Field E A . Atopy and other risk factors for UK dentists reporting an adverse affect to latex gloves. Contact Derm 1998, 38: 132–136.
Lonnroth E C, Shahnavaz H . Adverse health reactions in skin, eyes, and respitory tract among dental personnel in Sweden. Swed Dent J 1998; 22: 33–45.
Amin A, Palenik C J, Cheung S W, Burke F J . Latex exposure and allergy: a survey of general dental practitioners and dental students. Int Dent J 1998; 48: 77–83.
Field E A, Longman L P, Al-Sharkawi M, Perrin L, Davies M . The dental management of patients with natural rubber latex allergy. Br Dent J 1998; 185: 65–69.
Field E A, Fay M F . Issues of latex safety in dentistry. Br Dent J 1995; 179: 247–253.
Field E A . The euse of powdered gloves in dental practice: a couse for concern? J Dent 1997; 25: 209–214.
Matis B A, Valadez D, Valadez E . The effect of the use of dental gloves on mixing polysiloxane putties. J Prosthodont 1997; 6: 189–192.
Holtan J R, Lua M J, Belvedere P C, Lambert D L . Evaluating the effect of glove coating on the shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 611–616.
Gore S M, Felix D H, Bird A G, Wray D . Occupational risk and precautions related to HIV infections among dentists in the Lothian region of Scotland. J Infect 1994; 28: 209–212.
Walsh L J, Lange O, Savage N W . Factors influencing the wearing of protective gloves in general dentist practice. Quint Int 1995; 203–209.
Porter S R, El-Maaytah M, Afonso W, Scully C, Leung T . Compliance of UK dental staff and students with infection control measures. Oral Diseases 1995; 1: 198–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porter, S. No significant benefit from the use of double-gloving or perforation indication system. Br Dent J 186, 24 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800008a1
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800008a1
