Key Points
-
The quantity and quality of undergraduate sedation teaching varies considerably across the UK and Irish dental schools.
-
Students at most dental schools are failing to receive adequate hands-on sedation experience, especially in intravenous techniques.
-
Undergraduate sedation training must improve if conscious sedation is to become the principle alternative to GA in dental practice.
Abstract
Aim To assess and compare, for the first time, the quantity and quality of dental undergraduate teaching in conscious sedation in the dental schools of the UK and Ireland. This was achieved using a prospective, questionnaire-based survey.
Methods Questionnaires were designed to collect information about undergraduate sedation education from teaching staff and final year dental undergraduates at the 16 dental schools in the UK and Ireland. Staff questionnaires were distributed to a nominated sedation teacher at each dental school and sought details of didactic and clinical sedation teaching methods, plus the quantity and perceived quality of sedation teaching. Student questionnaires were distributed to 5th year dental students and enquired about the quantity and quality of clinical sedation teaching received. The survey was undertaken during May-June 1998.
Results Thirteen dental schools returned staff questionnaires (81%). Seven also provided a student response (44%). The proportion of final year students within the 7 schools who returned completed questionnaires was 38%. Sedation teaching was undertaken primarily by oral surgery and paediatric dental departments. Three schools also utilised anaesthetic departments and 2 schools had dedicated dental sedation departments. All but 2 schools provided didactic teaching on sedation (mean: 4.2 lectures, 1.8 seminars). Of the 7 schools which returned staff and student questionnaires, all provided some clinical training using inhalational and intravenous demonstration cases (mean 5.1 and 4.4 cases, per student, respectively). All but one school provided hands-on inhalational sedation experience (mean 2.6 cases per student) but only two schools provided any hands-on intravenous sedation experience. The quantity of hands-on experience was greater at the two dental schools with dedicated dental sedation departments. Across the schools students rated the overall quality of sedation teaching at average or above, but most staff graded the overall quality of teaching at below average.
Conclusion Dental undergraduate sedation teaching shows considerable variation across the dental schools surveyed. At most schools students gained little or no hands-on experience in sedation, especially in intravenous techniques. The undergraduate foundation for sedation education must improve if conscious sedation is to become the principal alternative to general anaesthesia in dental practice.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Todd J E, Lader D . Adult dental heath. London: HMSO, 1991.
Ryder W, Wright PA . Conscious sedation: A review. Br Dent J 1988; 165: 207–216.
Girdler N M, Hill C M . Sedation in Dentistry. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1998.
General Dental Council. The first five years: the undergraduate dental curriculum. London: General Dental Council, 1997.
Royal College of Surgeons of England. Report of the Joint Dental Faculties Working Party on Sedation. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1993.
Poswillo D E . General anaesthesia, sedation and resuscitation in dentistry: Report of an Expert Working Party for the Standing Dental Advisory Committee. London, Department of Health, 1990.
General Dental Council. Report of the visitation to dental schools 1993–1995. London, General Dental Council, 1995.
Levine R S . Experience, skill and knowledge gained by newly qualified dentists during their first year of general practice. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 97–102.
Crawford A N . The use of nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalational sedation with local analgesia as an alternative to general anaesthesia for dental extractions in children. Br Dent J 1990; 168: 395–398.
Skelly A M . Sedation in dental practice. Dental Update 1992; 19: 61–67.
General Dental Council. Report of the General Anaesthesia and Sedation Review Group. London, General Dental Council, 1996.
Seward M . GA — end of an era. Br Dent J 1998; 185: 497.
General Dental Council. Maintaining standards: Guidance to dentists on professional and personal conduct. London: General Dental Council, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leitch, J., Girdler, N. A survey of the teaching of conscious sedation in dental schools of the United Kingdom and Ireland. Br Dent J 188, 211–216 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800433
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800433
This article is cited by
-
A study of dental students' clinical knowledge acquisition and experiences in conscious sedation
British Dental Journal (2015)
-
Undergraduates’ perceptions of the value of practical inhalation sedation experience in a UK dental school
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (2015)
-
An investigation of complete denture teaching in the UK: part 2. The DF1 experience
British Dental Journal (2013)
-
Patient anxiety and IV sedation in Northern Ireland
British Dental Journal (2011)
-
Sedation in Wales: a questionnaire
British Dental Journal (2006)
