Abstract
This paper presents a comparison of the outcome of two cases where teeth, avulsed in sporting accidents, were replanted in general dental practice and have been reviewed for 5 years. Avulsed teeth which were stored dry, had a long extra-alveolar period and were splinted for a longer period of time, ultimately underwent replacement root resorption (case 1). There was no evidence of resorption, after 5 years, in the tooth that was stored in the patient's own saliva and was replanted within 45 minutes of being avulsed (case 2). The replantation procedure for these two cases was based on recent literature, which is also reviewed in this paper, and a protocol for the management of avulsed teeth is suggested
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, N., Duggal, M. Replantation in general dental practice. Br Dent J 176, 147–151 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808392
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808392
This article is cited by
-
A combined avulsion and root fracture/avulsion trauma with ten years review
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (2008)


