Key Points
-
Most dental patients appear to prefer to collaborate with, or even defer to their dentist, rather than take an active role in planning their own treatment.
-
Patients who have lost confidence in their dentist seem to have an increased desire for participation in treatment decisions.
-
The extent to which patients want to be involved in decisions about their dental treatment depends on many factors, and may vary within an individual, depending on circumstances.
-
Identifying and accommodating patients' role preferences had great relevance in dentistry.
Abstract
Aims To assess the transferability of the Control Preferences Scale to dental settings and to explore patients' preferred and perceived roles in dental treatment decision-making.
Setting and participants A convenience sample of 40 patients, 20 recruited from the University Dental Hospital of Manchester and 20 from a general dental practice in Cheshire.
Methods A cross-sectional survey, using the Control Preferences Scale, a set of sort cards outlining five decisional roles (active, semi-active, collaborative, semi-passive, passive), slightly modified for use in dental settings. A second set of cards was used to identify perceived decisional role. Rationale for choice of preferred role was recorded verbatim.
Results The Control Preferences Scale was found to be transferable to dental settings. All patients in the sample had identifiable preferences regarding their role in treatment decision-making. A collaborative decisional role, with patient and dentist equally sharing responsibility for decision-making, was most popular at both sites. However, patients at both sites typically perceived themselves as attaining a passive role in treatment decisions. Lack of knowledge about dentistry and trust in the dentist were reported contributors to a passive decisional role preference, whilst those with more active role preferences gave rationales consistent with a consumerist stance.
Conclusions This exploratory study's findings suggest that dental patients have distinct preferences in relation to treatment decision-making role and that these may not always be met during consultations with their dentist. The Control Preferences Scale appears to be appropriate for use in dental settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
National Health Service Executive Patient Partnership: Building a collaborative strategy Department of Health: London 1996.
Department of Health The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform London: The Stationery Office 2000.
National Health Service Executive Patient and public involvement in the new NHS London: NHSE 2001.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T Decision making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision making model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 651–661.
Richards T Patients' priorities. Br Med J 1999; 318: 277.
Levine MN, Gafni G, Markham B, MacFarlane D A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 53–58.
Degner LF, Sloan JF, Venkatesh P The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997; 29: 21–43.
Coulter A Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997; 2: 112–121.
Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire P, Baum M, A'Hern RP Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. Br Med J 1994; 309: 448.
Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 1989; 4: 23–30.
Hack TF, Degner LF, Dyck DG Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med 1994; 39: 279–289.
Beaver K, Luker KA, Owens RG, Leinster SJ, Degner LF, Sloan JA Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 1996; 19: 8–19.
Beaver K, Bogg J, Luker KA Decision-making role preferences and information needs: a comparison of colorectal and breast cancer. Health Expect 1999; 2: 266–276.
Davison BJ, Degner LF, Morgan TR Information and decision making preferences of men with prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1995; 22: 1401–1407.
Degner LF, Kristjanson L, Bowman D et al. Decisional preferences and information needs in women with breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 277: 1485–1492.
Caress A-L, Luker KA, Ackrill P Patient-sensitive treatment decisions making? Preferences and perceptions in a sample of renal patients. NT Res 1998; 3: 364–372.
Neufeld KR, Degner LF, Dick JA A nursing intervention strategy to foster patient involvement in treatment decisions. Oncology Nursing Forum 1993; 20: 631–635.
Oates AJL, Fitzgerald M, Alexander G Patient decision making in relation to extensive restorative treatment. Part II: Evaluation of a patient decision making model. Br Dent J 1995; 179: 11–18.
Redford M, Gift HC Dentist-patient interactions in treatment decision making: a qualitative study. J Dent Educ 1997; 61: 16–21.
Kay EJ, Blinkhorn AS A qualitative investigation of factors governing dentists' treatment philosophies. Br Dent J 1996; 180: 171–176.
Corah NL, O'Shea RM, Pace LF, Seyrek SK Development of a patient measure of satisfaction with the dentist: the dental visit satisfaction scale. J Behav Med 1984; 7: 367–373.
Corah N, O'Shea RM, Bissell GD The dentist-patient relationship: perceptions by patients of dentist behavior in relation to satisfaction and anxiety. J Am Dental Assoc 1985; 111: 443–446.
O'Shea RM, Corah NL, Ayer WA Why patients change dentists: practitioners' views. J Am Dental Assoc 1986; 112: 851–854.
Murray H, Locker D, Mock D, Tenenbaum H Patient satisfaction with a consultation at a cranio-facial pain unit. Community Dent Health 1997 14 69–73.
Coombs CH A theory of data New York: John Wiley and Sons 1964.
Sloan JA, Yeung A Manual for Implementing Coombs Unidimensional Unfolding Model for Paired Comparisons Data (Manitoba Nursing Research Institute Technical Report No 12) Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba 1994.
McIver JP, Carmines EG Unidimensional Scaling London: Sage Publications 1981.
Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Rai H Quality at general practice consultations: cross-sectional survey. Br Med J 1999; 319: 738–743.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chapple, H., Shah, S., Caress, AL. et al. Exploring dental patients' preferred roles in treatment decision-making – a novel approach. Br Dent J 194, 321–327 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809946
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809946
This article is cited by
-
Developing a person-centred approach in dentistry beyond NHS recall intervals: a commentary
British Dental Journal (2023)
-
Does one size fit all? A qualitative study about the need for individualized information transfer for orthognathic patients
Head & Face Medicine (2022)
-
Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2020)
-
A cross-sectional study investigating patients' preferences regarding shared decision-making in adult orthodontic patients
British Dental Journal (2020)
-
The impact of dental phobia on care planning: a vignette study
British Dental Journal (2019)
