Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Conservation science

A market approach to saving the whales

The future of the International Whaling Commission is tenuous. A 'whale conservation market' might rescue it, say Christopher Costello, Leah R. Gerber and Steven Gaines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. International Whaling Commission Catch Limits & Catches Taken; available at http://go.nature.com/rcnfq5

  2. Gerber, L. R., DeMaster, D. & Roberts, S. Am. Sci. 88, 316–324 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, C. W. & Lamberson, R. Mar. Pol. 6, 103–120 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haltuch, M. A., Punt, A. E. & Dorn, M. W. Fish. Res. 100, 42–56 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goulder, L., Hafstead, M. & Dworsky, M. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 60, 161–181 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, T., Arnason, R. & Libecap, G. Annu. Rev. Res. Econ. 3, 159–179 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Black, R. Greenland whale hunt 'commercial' BBC News (17 June 2008); available at http://go.nature.com/vspyd5

  8. Pershing, A. J. et al. PLoS ONE 5, e12444 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Costello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costello, C., Gaines, S. & Gerber, L. A market approach to saving the whales. Nature 481, 139–140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/481139a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/481139a

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. sounds a bit dangerous, the "auction system" should be biased, bet can be placed, edge funds.. I'm joking of course but on my opinion the danger is very high

  2. The idea is good, but the whale price is grossly underestimated. You can't just consider the whalers, but also others who are involved in the whale trade, esp. the high-end restaurants in Japan. In the end, the prices would be shocking if not astronomical. Additionally, how do you enforce the permit system? Go to the WTO? Right now, there are still too many if's and given's in the proposal for me to be convinced.

  3. The organization IWC is based in UK and it cannot control over the whaling more than the suggestions because the question is that, what makes IWC in empower to control over whaling? Why Japan, USA, Russia and other should follow their guide lines. The inborn bioethics of governmental policymakers is leading the countries to abide the conservation guide lines as well to crush the bio ethics. Nature has given rights to every form of life to survive and to reproduce. My major question is that why Japanese?s leading whale to enter into threatened zone of existence and that is on the name of research purpose (very surprising). Science is not supposed to exploit the life forms to the level of danger zone. Why there is so strong bio ethics for human than the other life forms, we have to balance somewhere and we should opt something internationally so that nature can sustain us.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing