Key Points
-
Amalgam continues to predominate as the restorative material of choice for the restoration of permanent teeth.
-
Glass ionomer cements are widely used as luting cements and as bases and restorations by younger practitioners.
-
Rubber dam is not used routinely.
-
Stainless steel crowns are placed by a minority of practitioners for the restoration of deciduous molars.
Abstract
Objectives To investigate by questionnaire, the use and selection of materials and techniques for the placement of direct restorations and the provision of endodontics and bleaching by dental practitioners in the North West of England and Scotland.
Methods A questionnaire was sent to 1,000 general dental practitioners selected at random from dentists in Scotland and the North West of England. Non-responders were sent another questionnaire after a period of 4 weeks had elapsed.
Results A total of 701 usable questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 70%. The most commonly used material for the restoration of Class II cavities in premolar and permanent molar teeth was amalgam (n = 605, 86%) and (n = 634, 90%) respectively. Many practitioners (n = 419, 60%) felt amalgam should continue to be used; but a majority (n = 374, 66%) remained unconvinced about the merits of amalgam bonding. A minority (n = 63, 9%) of practitioners used predominantly directly placed resin composite rather than amalgam to restore Class II cavities in premolar and permanent molar teeth. Home-based vital bleaching was provided by a significant number (n = 245, 35%) of practitioners with only 18% (n = 123) providing practice-based bleaching. The most commonly used endodontic obturation technique was cold lateral condensation (n = 527, 75%) with 61% (n = 425) of respondents not using rubber dam routinely for endodontics.
Conclusions For the practitioners in this survey; amalgam was the most frequently selected direct restorative material. Few practitioners used amalgam bonding let alone direct resin composite for posterior restorations. Home-based rather than practice-based bleaching procedures were preferred; as were more traditional endodontic obturation techniques.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Dahl JE, Pallesen U . Tooth bleaching – a critical review of the biological aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14: 292–304.
Almas K, Al-Harbi M, Al-Gunaim M . The effect of a 10% carbamide peroxide home bleaching system on the gingival health. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003; 4: 32–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmer, N. Direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching. Br Dent J 197, 747 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811903
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811903
