Key Points
-
Almost half of the practitioners surveyed were aware of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique (ART).
-
Few practitioners, however, followed ART principles in their practice.
-
Further education on minimal intervention techniques would seem desirable.
Abstract
Background Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) was introduced a decade ago as a minimal intervention treatment for caries in unindustrialised countries, but UK general dental practitioners (GDPs) may also be using this technique.
Objective This study aimed to determine the materials and techniques used by a group of UK GDPs to treat caries in primary teeth.
Method A questionnaire, designed to determine GDPs' use of materials and techniques in the restoration of caries in primary teeth, was distributed to 600 GDPs in Scotland and England, with an explanatory letter and reply-paid envelope. The questionnaire included colour illustrations of two carious cavities in primary molar teeth and a request that respondents draw the cavity outline that they would use on the illustrations. The cavity outlines were assessed independently by two examiners. All other data were collated and analysed.
Results 390 usable replies were received, a response rate of 65%. Of the respondents, 99% treated child patients and 42% of respondents were aware of ART. For treatment of a small Class II cavity, 37% drew a cavity outline without extension beyond removal of caries and a majority suggested use of an adhesive material (51% glass ionomer, 13% compomer). For cavity preparation, 47% of respondents used a drill, 10% an excavator and 41% used both. For treatment of a large occluso-lingual cavity, again most used an adhesive technique (44% glass ionomer, 12% compomer) for its restoration, while 50% used a drill, 7% an excavator and 42% used both for cavity preparation.
Conclusion Most respondents used adhesive materials for restoration of caries in primary molars, but, despite 42% of respondents stating that they were aware of the treatment, 'true' ART was adopted by fewer than 10% of respondents.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Sarll DW . Who is responsible for good oral health? Br Dent J 1996; 180: 164–167.
Pine C . et al. Barriers to the treatment of childhood caries perceived by dentists working in different countries. Comm Dent Health 2004; 21: 112–120.
Pitts NB, Boyles J, Nugent ZJ, Thomas N, Pine CM .The dental caries experience of 5-year-old children in England and Wales (2003/4) and in Scotland (2002/3). Comm Dent Health 2005; 22: 46–56.
Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent NJ . What happens to unrestored carious deciduous teeth? Br Dent J 2002; 193: 99–103.
Slade GD . Epidemiology of dental pain and dental caries among children and adolescents. Comm Dent Health 2001; 18: 219–227.
British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. A policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paed 2001; 11: 153–157.
Foley J, Evans D, Blackwell A . Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 697–701.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarll, D. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in the UK. Br Dent J 199, 353 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812697
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812697
