Key Points
-
Reviews evidence with regard to anaesthetic selection in common medical conditions.
-
Indicates current practice within the dental population.
-
Emphasises the need for evidence-based practice.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to identify which local anaesthetic solutions were used by general dental practitioners in the United Kingdom and to determine selection criteria. In addition, differences in anaesthetic choice between recent graduates (≤5 years) and more experienced practitioners were investigated.
Material and methods Five hundred and six general dental practitioners attending postgraduate courses on pain control in dentistry completed a questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate year and place of qualification, anaesthetic solutions available in their surgeries and criteria used in the choice of anaesthetic. In addition, the respondents were asked to indicate choice of local anaesthetic in a number of common medical conditions. Questionnaires were distributed and collected immediately prior to the start of the course presentation and participants were not asked to indicate whether the selection decisions were teaching, experience or evidence based. Data were analysed by using the Chi-square test.
Results Lidocaine with epinephrine was the most widely available solution among this group of practitioners (94%), the second most common solution was prilocaine with felypressin (74%). The majority of practitioners had two or more solutions available. Practitioners who qualified within the last five years (14%) were more likely to have articaine available, the most recently introduced local anaesthetic into the UK (p = 0.04, one degree of freedom). Common medical conditions lead to a modification in anaesthetic selection: the use of prilocaine/felypressin increases in the majority of circumstances, although it is avoided in pregnant females by recent graduates.
Conclusions Lidocaine/epinephrine continues to be the most common anaesthetic solution used by this group of UK general practitioners. The primary criterion for selection of an anaesthetic agent was perceived efficacy. Prilocaine/felypressin is commonly selected as an alternative solution in the presence of common medical conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Roberts DH, Sowray JH . Local analgesia in dentistry. 2nd ed. pp 33–34. Bristol: Wright, 1979.
Rood JP . Local analgesia during pregnancy. Dent Update 1981; 8: 483–485.
Watson AK . Local anaesthetics in pregnancy. Br Dent J 1988; 165: 278–279.
Perusse R, Goulet J-P, Turcotte, J-Y . Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry: Part I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 679–686.
Meechan JG, Parry G, Rattray DT, Thomason JM . Effects of dental local anaesthetics in cardiac transplant recipients. Br Dent J 2002; 192: 161–163.
Sunada K, Nakamura K, Yamashiro M, et al. Clinically safe dosage of felypressin for patients with essential hypertension. Anesth Prog 1996; 43: 108–115.
Meechan JG . Plasma potassium changes in hypertensive patients undergoing oral surgery with local anaesthetics containing epinephrine. Anesth Prog 1997; 44: 106–109.
Bader JD, Bonito AJ, Sugars DA . A systematic review of cardiovascular effects of epinephrine on hypertensive dental patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 647–653.
Blackmore JW . Local anesthetic and sulfite sensitivity. Can Dent Assoc J 1988; 54: 249–252.
Perusse R, Goulet J-P, Turcotte, J-Y . Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry: Part II. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 687–691.
Meechan JG . The effects of dental local anaesthetics on blood glucose concentration in healthy volunteers and in patients having third molar surgery. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 373–376.
Rosa RM, Silva P, Young JB, et al. Adrenergic modulation of extrarenal potassium disposal. New Eng J Med 1980; 302: 431–434.
Whyte KF, Addis GJ, Whitesmith R, Reid JL . Adrenergic control of plasma magnesium in man. Clin Sci 1987; 72: 135–138.
Exton JH, Robison GA, Sutherland EW, Park CR . Studies on the role of adenosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate in the hepatic actions of glucagons and catecholamines. Biol Chem 1971.
Esmerino LA, Ranali J, Rodrigues AL . Blood glucose determination in normal and alloxan-diabetic rats after administration of local anesthetics containing vasoconstrictors. Braz Dent J 1998; 9: 33–37.
Ramacciato JC, Ranali J, Volpato MC, Groppo FC, Flório FM, Soares PCO . Local anesthetics use by dentists profile. J Dent Res 2002; 81(Spec Iss B): 491.
Daubländer M, Muller R, Lipp MDW . The incidence of complications associated with local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog 1997; 44: 132–141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corbett, I., Ramacciato, J., Groppo, F. et al. A survey of local anaesthetic use among general dental practitioners in the UK attending postgraduate courses on pain control. Br Dent J 199, 784–787 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813028
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813028
This article is cited by
-
Inferior alveolar nerve block: is articaine better than lidocaine?
British Dental Journal (2021)
-
Articaine buccal infiltration vs lidocaine inferior dental block – a review of the literature
British Dental Journal (2016)
-
Drug interactions in general dental practice – considerations for the dental practitioner
British Dental Journal (2014)
-
The efficacy of infiltration anaesthesia for adult mandibular incisors: a randomised double-blind cross-over trial comparing articaine and lidocaine buccal and buccal plus lingual infiltrations
British Dental Journal (2010)
-
Shortages of LA
British Dental Journal (2006)
