Key Points
-
Highlights problems concerning the low level of restorative care provided for carious primary teeth in general practice.
-
Presents audit data from a single GDP of a simplified method of placing preformed metal crowns, which does not involve LA or tooth preparation of any kind.
-
Although the technique looks promising, the need for prospective randomised clinical trials before the technique is adopted, is stressed.
Abstract
Background There is a high level of untreated dental decay in primary teeth in Scotland. Despite evidence for the efficacy of preformed metal crowns (PMCs) for the restoration of primary molars, few are placed in general practice, possibly due to the interventive nature of the clinical procedure. There is, however, a novel way of placing PMCs involving no local anaesthesia, no caries removal and no preparation of the tooth: the Hall technique.
Aim To investigate the survival of carious primary teeth treated with PMCs placed using a novel, simplified method — the Hall technique.
Setting General dental practice, in Scotland.
Method A retrospective analysis of practice records from one general practitioner, from 1988 to 2001. The majority of the 978 PMCs fitted on 259 children, using the Hall technique, were placed when there was clinical evidence of approximal caries into dentine. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to analyse survival times and the Mantel-Haenszel Log rank test for comparison between tooth types.
Results For all tooth types, the probability of surviving three years without being extracted or the PMC being lost, was 73.4% (95% confidence interval 70.1% to 76.4%), and for five years was 67.6% (95% confidence interval 63.3% to 71.5%). The probability of surviving without extraction alone for three years was 86.0% (95% confidence interval 83.2% to 88.4%), and for five years was 80.5% (95% confidence interval 76.5% to 83.9%).
Conclusions Hall technique restorations placed on primary molars with decay clinically into dentine, by a single operator in general dental practice, have a similar success rate to some other, more conventional, restorative techniques. The technique requires further evaluation through a prospective randomised control clinical trial before its use could be generally recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT . Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1387–1396.
Welbury RR, Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF . The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 177–181.
Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C et al. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001; 14:148–152.
Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK . Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation. Br Dent J 2002; 193:339–342.
Gross LC, Griffen AL, Casamassimo PS . Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars. Ped Dent 2001; 23:24–27.
Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, van AmerongenWE et al. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 1999; 33:387–392.
Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RCW, Peters TCR . Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1998; 11:143–148.
Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ et al. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J 2000; 189:93–97.
Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL . Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130:1459–1466.
Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K . Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Ped Dent 1999; 21:231–234.
Tickle MK, Milsom KM, Kearney-Mitchell P et al. The fate of the carious primary teeth of children who regularly attend the general dental service.[comment]. Br Dent J 2002: 192: 219–223.
Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ . The fate of 1,587 unrestored carious deciduous teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. [comment]. Br Dent J 2002; 193: 99–103.
Fayle SA, Welbury RR, Roberts JF . British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paed Dent 2001; 11: 153–157.
Page J, Welbury RR . Operative treatment of dental caries. In Welbury R R (Ed). Paediatric Dentistry. 2nd ed. pp 146–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Randall R, Vrijhoef M, Wilson N . Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs amalgam restorations in primary molars: a systematic review. JADA 2000; 131:337–343.
Scottish Dental Practice Board Annual Report 2001/2002 Trinity Park House, Edinburgh.
Scotland's National Dental Inspection Programme 2003.http://www.dundee.ac.uk/ndip/index.htm.
O'Brien M . Children's dental health in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO, 1994.
Milsom KM, Tickle M, Blinkhorn AS . Dental pain and dental treatment of young children attending the general dental service. Br Dent J 2002; 192:280–284.
Pitts N B, Nugent Z J, Smith P A . Scottish Health Boards Dental Epidemiological Programme. Report on 1997/1998 Survey of 5-year-old children.http://www.dundee.ac.uk/dhsru/shbdep97.
Kaplan EL, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations J Amer Stat Assoc 1958; 53:457–481.
Mantel N, Haenszel W .Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Nat Cancer Institute 1959; 21:719–748.
Chadwick B, Dummer P, Dummer F et al. How long do fillings last? (reviewed by: Asbjorn Jokstad) Evidence Based Dent 2002; 3:96–99.
McDonald SP, Sheiham A . A clinical comparison of non-traumatic methods of treating dental caries. Int Dent J 1994; 44:465–470.
Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P . Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22:278–86.
Ribeiro CC, Baratieri LN, Perdigao J et al. A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth. Quint Int 1999; 30:591–599.
Foley J, Evans DJP, Blackwell A . Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br Dent J 2004; 197: 697–701.
Duggal MS, Nooh A, High A . Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002; 3:111–114.
Kidd EAM, Pitts NB . A reappraisal of the value of the bitewing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior approximal caries. Br Dent J 1990; 169:195–200.
Evans DJP, Southwick CAP, Foley JI et al. The Hall technique: a pilot trial of a novel use of preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary teeth. 2000 http://www.scottishdental.org/pbrn/research/papers/rt03.htm
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of EastRen, The Chief Scientists Office of the Scottish Executive and 3M/ESPE for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Innes, N., Stirrups, D., Evans, D. et al. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice — A retrospective analysis. Br Dent J 200, 451–454 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813466
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813466
This article is cited by
-
Are zirconia crowns the superior choice when restoring primary posterior molars?
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2022)
-
Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) mainstream or unconventional option? Study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric dentists’ views and practices of MID for managing carious primary teeth in children across the United Kingdom and European Union
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (2022)
-
Preserving pulp vitality: part one - strategies for managing deep caries in permanent teeth
British Dental Journal (2021)
-
A 24-month retrospective study of preformed metal crowns: the Hall technique versus the conventional preparation method
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (2021)
-
Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars; 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting
BMC Oral Health (2020)
