Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Books & Arts
  • Published:

Sociology of science: Chasing the gravitational wave

Marianne de Laet enjoys a sociological analysis of how a select group of physicists works.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne de Laet.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Sociologist fools physics judges

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Laet, M. Sociology of science: Chasing the gravitational wave. Nature 501, 164–165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/501164a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/501164a

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. As an LSC (LIGO Scientific Collaboration) member and someone involved in the recent blind injection exercise [the one that Harry Collins calls 'Big Dog'] I am surprised to see a claim that "stakes were higher" or "the future of the field hung in the balance" as a result of it.

    The Advanced LIGO detectors that are currently being built and commissioned had already been planned and fully funded, and would have been built regardless of the outcome of the blind injection. No-one's career, employment, or funding was at stake &#8211 though some small private bets might have been made on the outcome, as is traditional in some branches of physics...
    People were, naturally, excited about a possible (though IMO only remotely possible) groundbreaking discovery, but this would have been a bonus on top of the results obtained from successful operation of the LIGO detectors over the previous years.

    If Collins gives the impression that the future of the GW observation effort really 'hung in the balance' then I am afraid he was not just over-dramatizing, he was misleading in order to tell a more exciting story. The Big Dog couldn't change the future direction of the field, but it could make us better prepared for whatever that future will bring.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Careers

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Careers newsletter — what matters in careers research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Careers