Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Scientific method: Defend the integrity of physics

Nature volume 516, pages 321–323 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Attempts to exempt speculative theories of the Universe from experimental verification undermine science, argue George Ellis and Joe Silk.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Woit, P. Not Even Wrong (Cape, 2006).

  2. Smolin, L. The Trouble with Physics (Penguin, 2006).

  3. Baggott, J. Farewell to Reality (Constable, 2013).

  4. Ellis, G. F. R. Sci. Am. 305, 38–43 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinhardt, P. Nature 510, 9 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawid, R. Phil. Sci. 73, 298–332 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis, G. F. R. Gen. Rel. Grav. 46, 1619 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. George Ellis is professor emeritus of applied mathematics at the University of Cape Town, South Africa.,

    George Ellis

  2. Joe Silk is professor of physics at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, France, and at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,

    Joe Silk

Authors
  1. George Ellis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joe Silk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to George Ellis or Joe Silk.

Supplementary Information

LISTEN

Comment editor Joanne Baker discusses the call for theoretical physics to be backed up by evidence

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Q&A: Space-time visionary 2014-Nov-12

Physics: Bell’s theorem still reverberates 2014-Jun-19

Physics: QBism puts the scientist back into science 2014-Mar-26

History: A medieval multiverse 2014-Mar-12

Physics: Broaden the search for dark matter 2014-Mar-05

Related external links

Alan Sokal: What is science and why should we care?—Part I

Peter Wojt: String theory and post-empiricism

Sabine Hossenfelder: Post-empirical science is an oxymoron

Sean Carroll: What Scientific Ideas Are Ready for Retirement?

George Ellis: Does the Multiverse Really Exist?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ellis, G., Silk, J. Scientific method: Defend the integrity of physics. Nature 516, 321–323 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/516321a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/516321a

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing