Researchers on social media ask at what point replication efforts go from useful to wasteful.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Norbury, C. F. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47, 1179–1193 (2004)
Norbury, C. F. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 90, 142–171 (2005)
Eberhardt, M. & Nadig, A. Res. Dev. Disabil. http://doi.org/bctr (2016).
Macleod, M. R. et al. Lancet 383, 101–104 (2014).
Moher, D., Tetzlaff, J., Tricco, A. C., Sampson, M. & Altman, D. G. PLoS Med. 4, e78 (2007).
Robinson, K. A. & Goodman, S. N. Ann. Intern. Med. 154, 50–55 (2011).
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test 2015-Aug-27
Collaborate and listen to reproduce research 2015-Jul-16
Irreproducible biology research costs put at $28 billion per year 2015-Jun-09
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh Chawla, D. How many replication studies are enough?. Nature 531, 11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/531011f
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/531011f
This article is cited by
-
Brief report: replication of the psychometric characteristics of the behavioral inflexibility scale in an independent sample
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (2022)
