Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Phylogeny

'Tree of life' took root 150 years ago

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgy S. Levit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hossfeld, U., Levit, G. 'Tree of life' took root 150 years ago. Nature 540, 38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/540038a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/540038a

This article is cited by

Comments

Commenting on this article is now closed.

  1. Uwe Hossfeld & Georgy S. Levit suggest that Charles Darwin published the first tree of life in On the Origin of Species in 1859 (Phylogeny: 'Tree of life' took root 150 years ago, Nature, 540, 38 2016). However, nineteen years earlier the American geologist Edward Hitchcock (1793-1864) published the first tree of life in his 'Elementary Geology' (1840). (see J. David Archibald, Edward Hitchcock?s Pre-Darwinian (1840) Tree of Life , Journal of the History of Biology 42, 561-592; 2009). Hitchcock produced a figure with two trees: one tree of plants and one tree of animals. The trees contain names of broad plant and animal groups. Furthermore, he divided the vertical axis in 7 geological periods. This tree of life is the earliest known version that incorporates paleontological and geological information.
    In Darwin's tree of life, there are neither taxonomic names, nor geological periods. There is no evidence that Darwin was aware of Hitchcock's tree.
    Ernst Haeckel's tree (in the illustration in the above article) contains only 2 horizontal lines, so has less geological detail than Hitchcock (1840). Maybe Haeckel's tree contains more taxonomic details, but not paleontological and geological details, and of course, it was published much later.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing