- Article metrics
- Last updated: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:11:27 Z
Neuroscience: The risks of reading the brain
Access & Citations
-
- 61k
- Article Accesses
-
- 6
- Citations
Citation counts are provided by Dimensions and depend on their data availability. Counts will update daily, once available.
Online attention
- 417 tweeters
- 6 blogs
- 47 Facebook pages
- 14 Google+ users
- 4 news outlets
- 1 Redditors
- 44 Mendeley
- 1 Citeulike
This article is in the 99th percentile (ranked 2,443rd) of the 446,413 tracked articles of a similar age in all journals and the 84th percentile (ranked 136th) of the 857 tracked articles of a similar age in Nature
View more on Altmetric
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
Mentions in news and blogs
-
Psychology’s Favorite Tool for Measuring Racism Isn’t Up to the Job
BPS Research Digest -
Brain Scanners Allow Scientists to ‘Read Minds’ – Could They Now Enable a ‘Big Brother’ Future?
Neuroscience RSS Feeds - Neuroscience News Updates -
Science Matters at #camlitfest
Cambridge Network - News -
Sex, Lies, and Brain Scans: What is really going on inside our heads?
Science Book a Day
This list highlights individual mainstream news articles and blogs that cite the article. Not all news and blogs link to articles in a way that Altmetric can pick up, so they are not representative of all media. Altmetric are responsible for the curation of this list and provide updates hourly.