Abstract
Data sources
PubMed and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register were searched. Reference lists from retrieved articles were also searched by hand for additional studies.
Study selection
For inclusion, an article had to satisfy the following criteria: cases in primary and early mixed dentition with unilateral posterior crossbite; be a randomised controlled trials (RCT) or prospective and retrospective studies with concurrent untreated as well as normal controls; clinical trials must have compared at least two treatment strategies without any untreated or normal control group involved; and be written in English, German, French or a Scandinavian language.
Data extraction and synthesis
Data extraction was carried out independently and in duplicate. Quality of the studies was assessed and categorised as low, medium and high. Interexaminer conflicts were resolved by discussion to reach a consensus.
Results
The search identified 1001 articles, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria. Only two RCT of early treatment of crossbite have been performed, and these two studies support grinding as treatment in the primary dentition. As treatment strategies, quad-helix (QH), expansion plates and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) are effective in the early mixed dentition with high success rates. There is, however, no scientific evidence available that shows which of the treatment modalities, that is, grinding, QH, expansion plates or RME, is the most effective.
Conclusions
Most of the studies have the serious drawback of lack of power because of small sample size, bias and confounding variables, lack of method error analysis and blinding in measurements, and deficient or lack of statistical methods. Thus, the studies were not of high enough quality level to draw any evidence-based conclusions. Better-controlled RCT with sufficient sample sizes are needed to obtain reliable scientific evidence identifying which treatment is the most effective for early correction of unilateral posterior crossbite. Future studies should also include assessments of long-term stability as well as analysis of costs and side-effects of the interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF . Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. Br J Surg 2000; 87:1448–1454.
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M . Systematic reviews of observational studies. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context Edited by Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG London: BMJ; 2003; 211–227.
Lagravere M, Major P, Flores-Mir C . Long-term dental arch changes after rapid maxillary expansion treatment: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2005; 75:151–157.
Lagravere M, Major P, Flores-Mir C . Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2005; 75:833–839.
Lagravere M, Major P, Flores-Mir C . Skeletal and dental changes with slow maxillary expansion: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2005 (in press).
Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M . Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31:115–123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Lars Bondemark, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, S-205 06 Malmö, Sweden. E-mail: lars.bondemark@od.mah.se
Petrén S, Bondemark L, Söderfeldt B. A systematic review concerning early orthodontic treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite. Angle Orthod 2003; 73:588–596
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flores-Mir, C. Grinding is effective in early orthodontic treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite. Evid Based Dent 6, 24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400315
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400315
