Abstract
Design
A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was carried out in a hospital environment.
Intervention
A total of 122 edentulous individuals, aged 45–75 years, were randomly allocated into groups to receive dentures made using either traditional or simplified techniques. Individuals allocated to the traditional arm had a final impression taken in a custom-made tray, a face-bow recording and a semi-adjustable articulator was used, with articulator remount after delivery. Those in the simplified-technique group had impressions taken in stock trays, no face-bow recording and a mono-plane articulator was used, with no articulator remount after delivery.
Outcome measure
The main outcome was the patients’ ratings on 100 mm Visual analogue scale (VAS) of overall general satisfaction with their set of dentures. Secondary outcomes were their VAS ratings of the maxillary and mandibular dentures alone for satisfaction, comfort, stability, aesthetics, ability to speak, ease of cleaning, and ability to chew soft white bread, hard cheese, raw carrot, sausage, steak, raw apple and lettuce. The clinical assessment of denture quality at the 6-month recall was carried out by four prosthodontists who were blind both to group allocation and to the purpose of the study.
Results
There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient ratings for overall satisfaction at 3 or 6 months
Conclusions
These results support the use of simplified techniques, which are easier to master and which should reduce treatment costs. Educators should consider these findings when designing curricula for prosthodontic training.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
British Society for the Study of Prosthetic Dentistry. Guidelines in Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry, London: Quintessence; 1996.
McCord JF, McNally LM, Smith PW, Gray NJA . Does the nature of the definitive impression material influence the outcome of (mandibular) complete dentures? Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2005; 13:105–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Yasuhiko Kawai, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Department of Gnatho-Oral Prosthetic Rehabilitation, 2-870-1, Sakaecho-nishi, Matsudo, Chiba 271-8587, Japan. E-mail: ykawai@mascat.nihon-u.ac.jp
Kawai Y, Murakami H, Shariati B, et al. Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques? J Dent 2005; 33:659–668.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jagger, R. Simple complete denture techniques can provide patient satisfaction. Evid Based Dent 7, 12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400382
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400382
This article is cited by
-
A Systematic Review of Impression Technique for Conventional Complete Denture
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society (2010)


