Abstract
Data sources
Articles were sourced using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Scopus (abstract and citation database; www.scopus.com), Embase and the reference lists of articles and dental conference proceedings. Researchers in the field and manufacturers were also contacted.
Study selection
Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCT) or quasi-RCT were selected if they compared failures in endodontically-treated permanent teeth with different types of post.
Data extraction and synthesis
Two review authors independently assessed the quality of trials and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.
Results
Two trials involving 317 participants were included, but only one of them (which had 200 participants) compared metal with nonmetal posts. The other answered the secondary objective. The risk of failure was greater with metal-cast posts (nine out of 98 metal posts failed) than with carbon fibre posts [using which, none out of 97 failed; risk ratio (RR), 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.00–0.90] but the study was at high risk of bias. Thus, even though fewer failures occurred when using nonmetal posts, the evidence is unreliable.
Conclusions
This review could not specify which type of post and core system should be used when two or three dentine walls remain. More RCT are needed to confirm whether fibre-reinforced post and core systems are superior, and to clarify the influence of the remaining tooth structure on the treatment outcome using different post and core systems. Well-defined inclusion criteria focusing on the number of dentine walls (two or three) should be used.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Morgano SM, Milot P . Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70:11–16.
Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ . The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994; 3:243–250.
Morgano SM, Rodrigues AH, Sabrosa CE . Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Am 2004; 48:397–416.
Goodacre CJ . Five factors to be considered when restoring endodontically treated teeth. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004; 16:457–462.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Luisa Fernandez, Cochrane Oral Health Group, Manchester Dental Education Centre, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK
Bolla M, Muller-Bolla M, Borg C, Lupi-Pegurier L, Laplanche O, Leforestier E. Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007; issue 1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Ansari, A. Which type of post and core system should you use?. Evid Based Dent 8, 42 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400489
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400489
