Abstract
Background
Previous evaluations showed that literature-search and selection methods reported in dental systematic reviews (SR) have improved since 2000. It is not known, however, whether these differences are consistent between the SR of the different dental specialities.
Methods
SR in dentistry published in the English language between 1 January 2000 and 14 June 2006 were located and then categorised by American Dental Association (ADA) recognised specialities. Search and selection methods were evaluated following an adaptation of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Search and selection methods between dental specialities were compared using Pearson's chi-squared analysis and ranked.
Results
There were significant differences between specialities in the following criteria: documentation of search dates (P 0.003); inclusion–exclusion documentation (P 0.017); article selection by two or more reviewers (P 0.001); and inclusion of all languages (P 0.014). Periodontics SR met the most criteria followed by oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) and then dental public heath (DPH). Prosthodontics along with the area of oral and maxillofacial radiology (OMR) met the fewest. All dental SR had low compliance with four criteria, only 65.7% searched more than Medline, 50.4% had a search strategy documented with Boolean operators, 51.5% had article selection carried out by two or more reviewers and only 25.7% included all languages.
Conclusions
Some dental specialities are better at reporting search and selection methods than others but all dental SR need some improvement in their reporting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Sutherland SE, Matthews DC . Conducting systematic reviews and creating clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: lessons learned. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135:747–753.
Mulrow CD . The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106:485–488.
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH . Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Can Med Assoc J 1988; 138:697–703.
Teagarden JR . Meta-analysis: whither narrative review?. Pharmacotherapy 1989; 9:274–281.
Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J . How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7:1–76.
Needleman I, Moles DR, Worthington H . Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality. Periodontol 2000 2005; 37:12–28.
Klassen TP, Jadad AR, Moher D . Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews. I. Getting started. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152:700–704.
Glenny AM, Esposito M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV . The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111:85–92.
Major MP, Major PW, Flores-Mir C . An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137:1252–1257.
Higgins JPT, Green S . Locating and selecting studies. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5. Section 5. Edited by Higgins JPT, Green S. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2005, issue 3. (www.cochrane.dk/cochrane/handbook/hbook.htm)
Stamm T, Hohoff A . Nonlinear behavior of search strategies for identifying relevant orthodontic articles. Angle Orthod 2004; 74:316–318.
Egger M, Smith GD . Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. 3rd Edn. Edited by Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2003:pp2–33.
Council on Dental Education and Licensure. Report of the ADA-recognized Dental Specialty Certifying Boards. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2005.
Bader J, Ismail A . Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135:464–473.
Niederman R, Chen L, Murzyn L, Conway S . Benchmarking the dental randomised controlled literature on Medline. Evid Based Dent 2002; 3:5–9.
Burt BA, Eklund SA . Research designs in oral epidemiology. In Dentistry, Dental Practice, and the Community. 5th Edn. Edited by Burt BA, Eklund SA. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1999:pp176–177.
Deeks JJ . Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. 3rd Edn. Edited by Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2003:pp248–282.
Burt DA, Eklund SA . The practice of dental public health. In Dentistry, Dental Practice, and the Community. 5th Edn. Edited by Burt BA, Eklund SA. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1999:p38.
Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA . Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 287:2805–2808.
Niederman R, Tantraphol MC, Slinin P, Hayes C, Conway S . Effectiveness of dentist-prescribed, home-applied tooth whitening. A meta analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2000; 1:20–36.
Poulsen S, Errboe M, Hovgaard O, Worthington HW . Potassium nitrate toothpaste for dentine hypersensitivity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; issue no 2.
Acknowledgements
Carlos Flores-Mir is supported by the 2006 Subtenly, Baker, Eastman Teaching Fellowship Award from the American Association Orthodontists Foundation, the 2007 Eugene E West Memorial Fellowship Award and an Orthodontic Faculty Development Award from the American Association of Orthodontics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Corresponding author: Carlos Flores-Mir, Director of the Craniofacial and Oral-health Evidence-based Practice Group, 4051 Dentistry/ Pharmacy Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2N8. Tel.: + 1 780 492 7409; fax: +1 780 492 7108; carlosflores@ualberta.ca
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Major, M., Major, P. & Flores-Mir, C. Benchmarking of reported search and selection methods of systematic reviews by dental speciality. Evid Based Dent 8, 66–70 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400504
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400504
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Therapies to limit myocardial injury in animal models of myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Basic Research in Cardiology (2019)
-
Methodological quality of systematic reviews analyzing the use of laser therapy in restorative dentistry
Lasers in Medical Science (2010)
