Abstract
Data sources
Relevant studies were sourced using the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline and Embase. The reference lists of relevant articles were searched and personal databases of trial reports used, in an attempt to locate additional published and unpublished trials. No language restriction was applied.
Study selection
Randomised controlled trials (RCT) were selected that involved people of age ≥18 years with single and multiple permanent teeth with a completely formed apex and no evidence of internal resorption, who required root canal treatment. Patients undertaking retreatment of a tooth were excluded.
Data extraction and synthesis
Screening of eligible studies was conducted in duplicate and independently by two review authors. Results were to be expressed as fixed- or random-effects models using mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was to be investigated including both clinical and methodological factors.
Results
No eligible RCT could be found.
Conclusions
This review illustrates how there are no published or ongoing RCT relevant to this review question and that there is currently insufficient evidence regarding the effectiveness of ultrasonic instrumentation used alone for orthograde root canal treatment. Future RCT might focus more closely on evaluating the effectiveness of hand instrumentation compared with hand instrumentation and adjunctive ultrasonic instrumentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Burleson A, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M . The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars. J Endod 2007;33:782–787.
Huttula AS, Tordik PA, Imamura G, Eichmiller FC, McClanahan SB . The effect of ultrasonic post instrumentation on root surface temperature. J Endod 2006; 32:1085–1087.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Luisa M Fernandez Mauleffinch, Cochrane Oral Health Group, MANDEC, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK. E-mail: luisa.fernandez@manchester.ac.uk
Sequeira P, Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Pedrazzi V. Ultrasonic versus hand instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; issue 4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balto, K. Insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of ultrasonic instrumentation for root canal treatment. Evid Based Dent 9, 12 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400563
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400563
