Abstract
Data sources
The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline and Embase were searched. Handsearching included several dental journals. Authors of all identified trials, an internet discussion group and 55 dental implant manufacturers were contacted to find unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCT).
Study selection
RCT were selected of root-form osseo-integrated oral implants that had a followup of 6 months–1 year and which compared the same osseo-integrated root-form implants immediately (within 1 week), early (1 week–2 months) and conventionally loaded (after 2 months), giving the following outcome measures: failures, implant failures and marginal bone levels on intra-oral radiographs.
Data extraction and synthesis
Data were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. Authors were contacted for details of randomisation and withdrawals and a quality assessment was carried out. The Cochrane Oral Health Group's statistical guidelines were followed.
Results
Twenty RCT were identified and 11 trials comprising a total of 300 patients were included. Six trials compared immediate versus conventional loading, three early versus conventional loading and two immediate versus early loading. On a patient, rather than per implant basis, there were no statistically significant differences for any of the meta-analyses.
Conclusions
It is possible to successfully load dental implants immediately or early after their placement in selected patients, but not all clinicians achieve optimal results when loading the implant immediately. A high degree of primary implant stability (high value of insertion torque) seems to be one of the prerequisites for a successful immediate/ early loading procedure. More well-designed RCT are needed. Priority should be given to trials comparing immediately versus early loaded implants to improve patient satisfaction and decrease treatment time and trials should be reported according to the CONSORT guidelines (http://www.consort-statement.org/).
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Luisa Fernandez, Oral Health Group Co-ordinator, MANDEC, 3rd Floor Dental Hospital, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK. E-mail: luisa.fernandez@manchester.ac.uk
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; issue 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eliyas, S., Al-Khayatt, A. No difference between failure rates of early and conventionally loaded implants. Evid Based Dent 9, 50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400583
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400583
This article is cited by
-
Correlation between resonance frequency, insertion torque and bone-implant contact in self-cutting threaded implants
Odontology (2017)
-
A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
International Journal of Implant Dentistry (2016)
