Abstract
Data sources
Randomised trial.
Study selection
Patients were randomised to either a Hawley or vacuum-formed retainer following completion of straight wire fixed appliance therapy. Study models were fabricated for each patient on day of debond and 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months after debond.
Data extraction and synthesis
Models were assessed at each time point for upper and lower intermolar widths, intercanine widths, arch length and a modified Little's index of irregularity. Method error was determined by repeating the measurements on 10 sets of models.
Results
There were no statistically significant differences between each of the two retainers for any of the variables under test at any time period.
Conclusions
There is no statistical or clinically significant difference in the measured arch width, arch length or modified Little's index over a 12-month period between Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers when worn full-time. Therefore, other factors may be more important when deciding on the more appropriate form of retainer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Dr Anthony John Ireland, Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS1 2LY UK. E-mail: tony.ireland@bristol.ac.uk
Barlin S, Smith R, Reed R, Sandy J, Ireland AJ. A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 404–409.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ledvinka, J. No difference in effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers at 12 months. Evid Based Dent 13, 24 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400846
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400846


