Abstract
Data sources
The BBO (Bibliografia Brasileira de Odontologia), Biomed Central, Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals, LILACS, Open-J-Gate, OpenSIGLE, PubMed, Sabinet and Science-Direct databases were searched.
Study selection
Articles were selected for review from the search results on the basis of their compliance with the broad inclusion criteria: relevant to the review question; and prospective two-arm (or more) clinical study. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of AO reported at the patient level.
Data extraction and synthesis
Two reviewers (VY and SM) independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the accepted articles. Individual dichotomous datasets for the control and test group were extracted from each article. Where possible, missing data were calculated from information given in the text or tables. In addition, authors were contacted in order to obtain missing information. Datasets were assessed for their clinical and methodological heterogeneity following Cochrane guidelines. Meta-analysis was conducted with homogeneous datasets. Publication bias was assessed by use of a funnel plot and Egger's regression.
Results
Ten randomised trials were included; almost all involved the removal of third molars. Only two of six identified application protocols (single application of chlorhexidine 0.2% gel or multiple application of 0.12% rinse versus placebo) were found to significantly decrease the incidence of AO.
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this review, only two of six identified application protocols were found to significantly decrease the incidence of AO. The evidence for both protocols is weak and may be challenged on the grounds of high risk of selection, detection/performance and attrition bias. This systematic review could not identify sufficient evidence supporting the use of chlorhexidine for the prevention of AO. Chlorhexidine seems not to cause any significantly higher adverse reactions than placebo. Future high-quality randomised control trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence on this topic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Kolokythas A, Olech E, Miloro M . Alveolar osteitis: a comprehensive review of concepts and controversies. Int J Dent 2010; 2010: 249073. Epub 2010 Jun 24. PubMed PMID: 20652078
Minguez-Serra MP, Salort-Llorca C, Silvestre-Donat FJ . Chlorhexidine in the prevention of dry socket: effectiveness of different dosage forms and regimens. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: e445–449. PubMed PMID: 19718007.
Noroozi AR, Philbert RF . Modern concepts in understanding and management of the “dry socket” syndrome: comprehensive review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 30–35. Epub 2008 Aug 28. Review. PubMed PMID: 18755610.
Hedström L, Sjögren P . Effect estimates and methodological quality of randomized controlled trials about prevention of alveolar osteitis following tooth extraction: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 8–15. Epub 2006 Apr 24. Review. PubMed PMID: 17178488.
Caso A, Hung LK, Beirne OR . Prevention of alveolar osteitis with chlorhexidine: a meta-analytic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 155–159. PubMed PMID: 15660084.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: SYSTEM Initiative/Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S. Chlorhexidine for the prevention of alveolar osteitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 1253–1264. [Epub ahead of print] PubMedPMID: 22622144
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, D. Does chlorhexidine prevent dry socket?. Evid Based Dent 13, 91 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400882
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400882