Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V . Failure rate of atraumatic restorative treatment using high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement compared to that of conventional amalgam restorative treatment in primary and permanent teeth: a systematic review update. J Minim Interv Dent 2012; 5: 63–124.
Hurst D . Poor quality evidence suggests that failure rates for atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional amalgam are similar. Evid Based Dent 2012; 13: 46–47.
Frencken JE, Leal SC, Navarro MF . Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview. Clin Oral Investig 2012; Jul 24. (Epub ahead of print).
Hurst D, Marcenes W . The effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) compared to conventional treatment in restoring class I dental cavities in permanent molar and premolar teeth: a systematic review. PROSPERO 2011: CRD42011001624.
Hurst D, Baysan A, Marcenes W . The effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) compared to conventional treatment in restoring class II dental cavities in permanent molar and premolar teeth: a systematic review. PROSPERO 2011: CRD42011001411.
Xia J, Wright J, Adams CE . Five large Chinese biomedical bibliographic databases: accessibility and coverage. Health Info Libr J 2008; 25: 55–61.
Jüni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M . Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31: 115–123.
Moher D, Pham B, Klassen TP, et al. What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 964–972.
Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V . Failure rate of atraumatic restorative treatment using high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement compared to conventional amalgam restorative treatment in primary and permanent teeth: a systematic review update – III. J Minim Interv Dent 2012; 5: 273–331.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Int J Surg 2010; 8: 336–341.
Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. (accessed 30 June 2012).
Odgaard-Jensen J, Vist GE, Timmer A, et al. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, Issue 4. Art. No. MR000012. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000012.pub3.
Berger VW, Ivanova A, Knoll MD . Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures. Stat Med 2003; 22: 3017–3028.
Berger VW . Selection bias and covariate imbalances in randomised clinical trials. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2005.
Berger VW, Alperson SY . A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2009; 4: 79–88.
Mickenautsch S . SYSTEM Research note on: A simulation method to test for potential accuracy of a selection bias test for RCTs. J Minim Interv Dent 2012; 5: 58–62.
Mickenautsch S . SYSTEM Research note on: Initial observations of diagnostic accuracy concerning quantitative testing for selection bias in RCTs. J Minim Interv Dent 2012; 5: 126–185.
James P, Parnell C, Whelton H . The caries-preventive effect of chlorhexidine varnish in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Caries Res 2010; 44: 333–340.
Papas AS, Vollmer WM, Gullion CM, et al. Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Varnish for the Prevention of Adult Cries: A randomized trial. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 150–155.
Vollmer WM, Papas AS, Bader JD, et al. Design and Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS): a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a chlorhexidine dental coating for the prevention of adult caries. BMC Oral Health 2010; 10: 23.
Forgie AH, Paterson M, Pine CM, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ . A randomised controlled trial of the caries-preventive efficacy of a chlorhexidine-containing varnish in high-caries-risk adolescents. Caries Res 2000; 34: 432–439.
Banting DW, Papas A, Clark DC, Proskin HM, Schultz M, Perry R . The effectiveness of 10% chlorhexidine varnish treatment on dental caries incidence in adults with dry mouth. Gerodontology 2000; 17: 67–76.
Slot DE, Vaandrager NC, Van Loveren C, Van Palenstein Helderman WH, Van der Weijden GA . The effect of chlorhexidine varnish on root caries: a systematic review. Caries Res 2011; 45: 162–173.
Milgrom P, Tanzer JM . Perspectives on PACS: where is caries prevention clinical research going? J Dent Res 2012; 91: 122–124.
Bailey D, Adams G, Marinho VCC, Tsao C, Hyslop A, Morgan M . Chlorhexidine interventions for the prevention of caries in adults (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009. Issue 3. Art No. CD007856.
Eberhand J, Sandmann T, Marinho VCC, Dommisch H, Jepsen S, Stiesch M, Geurtsen W . Chlorhexidine versus topical fluoride treatment for the prevention and management of dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012. Issue 7. Art No. CD009962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mickenautsch, S., Yengopal, V. & Perry, R. Letters to EBD. Evid Based Dent 13, 93–95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400884
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400884
