Abstract
Data sources
Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, US National Institutes of Health Trials Register and World Health Organisation (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.
Study selection
Parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any type of slow-release fluoride device irrespective of publication status, language or blinding were considered. Split mouth studies were excluded.
Data extraction and synthesis
Standard Cochrane methods were followed with at least two reviewers independently undertaking all the key steps.
Results
Only one trial which was considered to be at high risk of bias was included. The trial included 174 children with 132 available for two year examination. However statistical analysis was performed on only the 63 children (31 in intervention group, 32 in control group) who had retained the beads (retention rate was 47.7% at two years). Among these 63 children, caries increment was reported to be statistically significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (DMFT: mean difference −0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.23 to −0.21; DMFS: mean difference −1.52, 95% CI −2.68 to −0.36 (very low quality evidence)). Although this difference was clinically significant, it only holds true for those children who retained the fluoride beads; over 50% of the children did not retain the beads. Adverse effects were not reported.
Conclusions
There is insufficient evidence to determine the caries-inhibiting effect of slow-release fluoride glass beads. The body of evidence available is of very low quality and there is a potential overestimation of benefit to the average child. The applicability of the findings to the wider population is unclear; the study had included children from a deprived area that had low levels of fluoride in drinking water, and were considered at high risk of carries. In addition, the evidence was only obtained from children who still had the bead attached at two years (48% of all available children); children who had lost their slow-release fluoride devices earlier might not have benefited as much from the devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A . Topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels or varnishes) for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 4: Art. No.: CD002782. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD 002782.
Marinho VC . Cochrane reviews of randomized trials of fluoride therapies for preventing dental caries. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009; 10: 183–191. Review. PubMed PMID: 19772849.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Dental interventions to prevent caries in children. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2014. (SIGN publication no. 138). [March 2014]. Available from URL: http://www.sign.ac.uk
Toumba KJ, Curzon ME . Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost of a slow fluoride releasing device. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 964.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Luisa Fernandez Mauleffinch, Managing Editor, Cochrane Oral Health Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, JR Moore Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: luisa.fernandez@manchester.ac.uk
Chong LY, Clarkson JE, Dobbyn-Ross L, Bhakta S. Slow-release fluoride devices for the control of dental decay. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 11: Art. No. CD005101. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005101.pub3.
This paper is based on a Cochrane Review published in the Cochrane Library 2014, issue 11 (see www.thecochranelibrary.com for information). Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback, and the Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, D. Insufficient evidence that slow-release fluoride devices reduce caries. Evid Based Dent 16, 45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401092
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401092
