Abstract
Data sources
Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline , Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, the Web of Science Conference Proceedings, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.
Study selection
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing topically applied fluoride gel with placebo or no treatment in children up to 16 years were considered. Studies had to be at least one year in duration with a frequency of application of at least once a year with blind outcome assessment. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces in both permanent and primary teeth (D(M)FS and d(e/m)fs).
Data extraction and synthesis
At least two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF). Where data could be pooled random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random-effects meta-regression analyses.
Results
Twenty-eight trials involving 9140 children and adolescents were included. Most of the studies (20) were at high risk of bias, with eight at unclear risk of bias. Twenty-five trials (8479 participants) provided data for meta-analysis on permanent teeth, with a D(M)FS pooled prevented fraction (PF) estimate of 28% (95% CI; 19-36%; P < 0.0001; with substantial heterogeneity (P < 0.0001; I2 = 82%); moderate quality evidence). Subgroup and metaregression analyses suggested no significant association between estimates of D(M)FS prevented fractions and the prespecified trial characteristics. However, the effect of fluoride gel varied according to the type of control group used, with D(M)FS PF on average being 17% (95% CI 3% to 31%; P = 0.018) higher in non-placebo-controlled trials (the reduction in caries was 38% (95% CI 24% to 52%; P < 0.0001, 2808 participants) for the ten trials with no treatment as control group, and 21% (95% CI 15% to 28%; P < 0.0001, 5671 participants) for the 15 placebo-controlled trials.
A funnel plot of the 25 trials in the D(M)FS PF meta-analysis indicated a relationship between prevented fraction and study precision, with an apparent lack of small studies with statistically significant large effects.
For primary teeth the d(e/m)fs pooled prevented fraction estimate for the three trials (1254 participants) = 20% (95%CI; 1% - 38%; P = 0.04; with no heterogeneity (P = 0.54; I2 = 0%); low quality evidence).
There was limited reporting of adverse events. Only two trials reported information on acute toxicity signs and symptoms during the application of the gel (risk difference 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.02; P = 0.36; with no heterogeneity (P = 36; I2 = 0%); 490 participants; very low quality evidence). None of the trials reported information on tooth staining, mucosal irritation or allergic reaction.
Conclusions
The conclusions of this updated review remain the same as those when it was first published. There is moderate quality evidence of a large caries-inhibiting effect of fluoride gel in the permanent dentition. Information concerning the caries-preventive effect of fluoride gel on the primary dentition, which also shows a large effect, is based on low quality evidence from only three placebo-controlled trials. There is little information on adverse effects or on acceptability of treatment. Future trials should include assessment of potential adverse effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Marcenes W, Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, et al. Global burden of oral conditions in 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. J Dent Res 2013; 92: 592–597.
Petersen PE . World Health Organization global policy for improvement of oral health – World Health Assembly 2007. Int Dent J 2008; 58:115-121.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Dental interventions to prevent caries in children. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2014. (SIGN publication no. 138). (March 2014). Available from URL: http://www.sign.ac.uk
Weyant RJ, Tracy SL, Anselmo TT, et al. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs Expert Panel on Topical Fluoride Caries Preventive Agents. Topical fluoride for caries prevention: executive summary of the updated clinical recommendations and supporting systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144:1279–1291. Review. Erratum in: J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144: 1335. Dosage error in article text.
Marinho VC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Clarkson JE . Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7: CD002279.
Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe P, Marinho VC, Shi X . Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1): CD007868.
Wong MC, Glenny AM, Tsang BW, Lo EC, Worthington HV, Marinho VC . Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1):CD007693.
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Sheiham A, Logan S . Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1):CD002781.
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Sheiham A, Logan S . One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1):CD002780. Review. PubMed PMID: 14973991.
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A . Topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels or varnishes) for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (4): CD002782. Review. PubMed PMID: 14583954.
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A . Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD002284. Review. PubMed PMID: 12917928.
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Sheiham A, Logan S . Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (1):CD002278. Review. PubMed PMID: 12535435.
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A . Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (3): CD002279. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (7):CD002279. PubMed PMID: 12137653.
Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A . Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (2): CD002280. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (6): CD002280. PubMed PMID: 12076446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for correspondence: Luisa Fernandez Mauleffinch, Managing Editor, Cochrane Oral Health Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, JR Moore Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: luisa.fernandez@manchester.ac.uk
Marinho VC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Chong LY. Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 6; Art. No. CD002280. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002280.pub2.
This paper is based on a Cochrane Review published in the Cochrane Library 2015, issue 6 (see www.thecochranelibrary.com for information). Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback, and the Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, D. Fluoride gel effective at reducing caries in children. Evid Based Dent 16, 108–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401131
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401131
