Table 5 Results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis for maternal reports: (a) CBCL Internalising, (b) CBCL Externalising, (c) CBCL Total problem, and (d) CHQ-MH Cases According to Dimensions of the FAD, FES Cohesion, BDI and Child gender
Relative risk of Internalising case | 95% CI | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) Internalising cases | ||||
Maternal depression | Case : Noncase | 5.5 | 1.7–17.4 | 0.002 |
FAD Role Allocation | Worst : Best quartile | 2.5 | 1.4–4.3 | 0.01 |
Sex of child | Female : Male | 2.7 | 1.0–7.1 | 0.04 |
Relative risk of Externalising case | 95% CI | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
(b) Externalising cases | ||||
FES cohesion | ||||
Moderate : Good cohesion | 2.7 | 1.3–5.6 | 0.001 | |
Poor : Good cohesion | 7.1 | 1.6–31.7 | ||
FAD behaviour control | Worst : Best quartile | 2.3 | 1.0–5.1 | 0.04 |
Relative risk of Total Problems case | 95% CI | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
(c) Total problem cases | ||||
FAD Affective Involvement | Worst : Best quartile | 3.2 | 1.3–7.8 | 0.005 |
SF8 Physical | Worst : Best quartile | 2.3 | 1.1–5.1 | 0.03 |
Relative risk of CHQ-MH case | 95% CI | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
(d) CHQ-MH Cases | ||||
Maternal depression | BDI Case : Noncase | 5.3 | 2.0–14.4 | 0.001 |
