Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological findings between FISH negative and positive gastric carcinomas

From: Association of ERBB2 gene status with histopathological parameters and disease-specific survival in gastric carcinoma patients

 

ERBB2 amplification

 
 

Negative ( n =218)

Positive ( n =38)

P value

Age (years)

66 (±10.8)

63 (±13.6)

NS

   

NS

Sex

   

 Male

127 (58.3%)

18 (47.4%)

 

 Female

91 (41.7%)

20 (52.6%)

 

Histopathological classification(s)

 Lauren

  

0.007

Intestinal

121 (55.5%)

31 (81.6%)

 

Diffuse

63 (28.9%)

3 (7.9%)

 

Non classified

34 (15.6%)

4 (10.5%)

 

 Carneiro

  

0.013

Glandular

119 (54.5%)

31 (81.6%)

 

Isolated cells

62 (28.4%)

3 (7.9%)

 

Solid

5 (2.3%)

2 (5.3%)

 

Mixed

28 (12.8%)

2 (5.3%)

 

Non classified

4 (1.8%)

  

 Ming

  

0.021

Expansive

56 (26%)

18 (47.4%)

 

Infiltrative

153 (71.2%)

20 (52.6%)

 

Mixed

6 (2.8%)

 

Venous invasion

  

NS

 Positive

147 (68%)

24 (63.2%)

 

 Negative

69 (32%)

14 (36.8%)

 

Nodal metastases a

  

NS

 N0

73 (34%)

9 (23.7%)

 

 N+

142 (66%)

29 (76.3%)

 

Clinical stage a

  

NS

 0–IA

26 (12.1%)

2 (5.3%)

 

 IB

21 (9.8%)

3 (7.9%)

 

 II

41 (19%)

7 (18.4%)

 

 IIIA

50 (23.3%)

10 (26.3%)

 

 IIIB

35 (16.3%)

7 (18.4%)

 

 IV

42 (19.5%)

9 (23.7%)

 

Type of surgery a

  

NS

 Curative

141 (72.3%)

23 (67.6%)

 

 Palliative

54 (27.7%)

11 (32.4%)

 
  1. NS=non significant.
  2. aMissing cases due to lack of clinical information.