Table 1 Studies examining the effectiveness of individual-level interventions

From: Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review

Reference

Cancer

Design

Intervention

Participants

Outcome (time of measurement)

Results

Quality of evidence (see Appendix D online )

de Nooijer et al (2004)

Any cancer

RCT comparing:

Individually tailored information vs

General information vs

No information

Tailored information delivered by post: letter tailored to individual based on knowledge and intentions. Included information on cancer symptoms (for several cancers), reasons for early detection, risk, breast and testicular self-examination, screening programmes.

General information delivered by post: brochure on early detection in several cancers used by Dutch Cancer Society.

1331 adults (mean age 47, 80% women) without cancer recruited through newspaper adverts in the Netherlands

Knowledge of cancer symptoms (range 0, 15) (3 weeks)

Attitude towards paying attention to symptoms (range −3, 3) (6 months)

Attitude towards seeking help for symptoms (range −3, 3) (6 months)

Higher in tailored information group vs general information group vs control (9.85 vs 9.26 vs 8.21, P<0.001) Higher in tailored information group vs general information group vs control (2.05 vs 2.05 vs 1.96, P<0.01)

Higher in tailored information group vs general information group vs control (2.13 vs 2.09 vs 1.99, P<0.001)

+

Rimer et al (2002)

Breast

RCT comparing:

Tailored print materials vs

Tailored print materials plus telephone

Counselling vs

Usual care

Tailored information delivered by post: booklet about breast cancer risk, risk factors and mammography tailored to individual based on responses provided during telephone call. Reinforcing newsletter 12 months later.

Tailored information plus telephone counselling: As above plus two telephone calls (one after booklet and one after newsletter) from trained health advisor asking questions about booklet/newsletter content to elicit questions and concerns.

1091 women (aged 42–57) enrolled in health insurance plan in United States

Knowledge that women aged >50 at higher risk of breast cancer than younger women (24 months)

Higher in tailored print materials plus telephone counselling group vs tailored print materials group vs usual care (32% vs 26% vs 20%, P=0.001)

+

Glazebrook et al (2006)

Melanoma

Cluster RCT (unit of randomisation=practice) comparing:

Educational vs

No programme

Computer-based interactive educational programme to increase melanoma knowledge (including risk of sun exposure, how to protect skin, early signs) accessed through dedicated workstation in GP practice.

589 adults (mean age 38, 80% women) recruited from people with 1+ risk factor for melanoma attending general practice in United Kingdom

Knowledge of how to reduce risk of melanoma, risk factors, symptoms (range 0, 12) (6 months)

Higher in programme group vs no programme group (4.12 vs 3.36, P<0.001)

 

Boundouki et al (2004)

Oral

Cluster RCT (unit of randomisation=session) comparing:

Leaflet vs

No leaflet

Leaflet to increase knowledge of oral cancer signs, risk factors and how to detect oral cancer, given out in waiting room.

316 adults (mean age 47, 59% women) attending dentist in United Kingdom

Knowledge of oral cancer (range 0, 36) (8 weeks)

Higher in leaflet group vs no leaflet group (30.3 vs 29.0, P<0.001)

+

Wilt et al (2001)

Prostate

RCT comparing:

Leaflet vs

No leaflet

Leaflet to increase knowledge about risks and benefits of early prostate cancer detection and treatment delivered by post.

550 men (mean age 72) attending a primary care centre in United States

Knowledge of natural history of untreated early prostate cancer (2 weeks)

Knowledge that effectiveness of treatment in early prostate cancer is unknown (2 weeks)

No difference

Higher in leaflet group vs no leaflet group (56% vs 44%, P=0.04)

+

  1. Abbreviations: GP=general practitioner; RCT=randomised controlled trial.