Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Cathepsin-D in primary breast cancer: prognostic evaluation involving 2810 patients
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 December 1998

Cathepsin-D in primary breast cancer: prognostic evaluation involving 2810 patients

  • J A Foekens1,
  • M P Look1,
  • J Bolt-de Vries1,
  • M E Meijer-van Gelder1,
  • W L J van Putten2 &
  • …
  • J G M Klijn1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 79, pages 300–307 (1999)Cite this article

  • 1152 Accesses

  • 112 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

There is controversy regarding the prognostic value of cathepsin-D in primary breast cancer. An increased level of cathepsin-D in tumour extracts has been found to be associated with a poor relapse-free and overall survival. Studies performed with immunohistochemistry or Western blotting have produced diverse results. We have analysed 2810 cytosolic extracts obtained from human primary breast tumours for cathepsin-D expression, and have correlated their levels with prognosis. The median follow-up of the patients still alive was 88 months. Patients with high cathepsin-D levels had a significantly worse relapse-free and overall survival, also in multivariate analysis (P < 0.0001). Adjuvant therapy which was associated with an improved prognosis in node-positive patients in univariate analysis, also significantly added to the multivariate models for relapse-free and overall survival. There were no statistically significant interactions between the levels of cathepsin-D and any of the classical prognostic factors in analysis for relapse-free survival, suggesting that the prognostic value of cathepsin-D is not different in the various subgroups of patients. Indeed, multivariate analyses in subgroups of node-negative and -positive patients, pre- and post-menopausal patients, and their combinations, showed that tumours with high cathepsin-D values had a significantly poor relapse-free survival, with relative hazard rates ranging from 1.3 to 1.5, compared with tumours with low cathepsin-D levels. The results presented here on 2810 patients confirm that high cytosolic cathepsin-D values are associated with poor prognosis in human primary breast cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

Identifying breast cancer patients at risk of relapse despite pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy

Article Open access 07 April 2023

Prognostic value of adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-negative T1a and T1bN0M0 breast cancer patients

Article Open access 17 January 2025

Survival prediction in triple negative breast cancer using multiple instance learning of histopathological images

Article Open access 25 August 2022

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M. & Brunk, H. D. (1972). Statistical Interference Under Order Restrictions, John Wiley & Sons: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benraad, T. h., Geurts-Moespot, A., Sala, M., Piffanelli, A. & Ross, A., Foekens, J. A. on behalf of the EORTC Receptor Study Group (1992). Quality control of cathepsin D measurement by the EORTC Receptor Study Group. Eur J Cancer 28: 72–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briozzo, P., Morisset, M., Capony, F., Rougeot, C. & Rochefort, H. (1988). In vitro degradation of extracellular matrix with Mr 52 000 cathepsin D secreted by breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 48: 3688–3692.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briozzo, P., Badet, J., Capony, F., Pieri, I., Montcourrier, P., Barritault, D. & Rochefort, H. (1991). MCF-7 mammary cancer cells respond to bFGF and internalize it following its release from extracellular matrix: a permissive role of cathepsin D. Exp Cell Res 194: 252–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardiff, R. D. (1994). Cathepsin D and breast cancer: useful?. Hum Pathol 25: 847–848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, C. A. & De Leon, D. D. (1994). Acid-activated insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 proteolysis in normal and transformed cells: role of cathepsin D. J Biol Chem 269: 7076–7080.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. J., O’Grady, P., Devaney, D., O’Sorian, L., Fennelly, J. J. & Lijnen, H. J. (1988). Urokinase-plasminogen activator, a marker for aggressive breast cancers. Cancer 62: 531–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domagala, W., Striker, G., Szadowska, A., Dukowicz, A., Weber, K. & Osborn, M. (1992). Cathepsin D in invasive ductal NOS breast carcinoma as defined by immunohistochemistry: no correlations with survival at 5 years. Am J Pathol 141: 1003–1012.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Emmert-Buck, M. R. (1996). Cathepsin D and prognosis in breast cancer: one piece of a larger puzzle?. Hum Pathol 27: 869–871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (1980). Revision of the standards for the assessment of hormone receptors in human breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 16: 1513–1515.

  • Ferrandina, G., Scambia, G., Bardelli, F., Panici, P. B. & Massori, A. (1997). Relationship between cathepsin-D content and disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 76: 661–666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foekens, J. A., Portengen, H., van Putten, W. L. J., Peters, H. A., Krijnen, HLJM, Alexieva-Figusch, J. & Klijn, J. G. M. (1989). Prognostic value of estrogen and progesterone receptors measured by enzyme immunoassays in human breast tumor cytosols. Cancer Res 49: 5823–5828.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foekens, J. A., van Putten, W. L. J., Portengen, H., de Koning, HYWCM, Thirion, B., Alexieva-Figusch, J. & Klijn, J. G. M. (1993). Prognostic value of PS2 and cathepsin D in 710 human primary breast tumors: multivariate analysis. J Clin Oncol 11: 899–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foekens, J. A., Schmitt, M., van Putten, W. L. J., Peters, H. A., Portengen, H., Kramer, M. D., Jänicke, F. & Klijn, J. G. M. (1994). Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and prognosis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12: 1648–1658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foekens, J. A., Berns, EMJJ, Look, M. P. & Klijn, J. G. M. (1996). Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer (1996). In Hormone-Dependent Cancer, Pasqualini JR, Katzenellebogen BS (eds), pp. 217–252, Marcel Dekker: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M., Derocq, D., Pujol, P. & Rochefort, H. (1990). Overexpression of transfected cathepsin D in transformed cells increases their malignant phenotype and metastatic potency. Oncogene 5: 1809–1814.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. J. (1992). Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with applications to breast cancer prognosis. J Am Stat Assoc 87: 942–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. A., McCarthy, A. L., Angus, B., Westley, B. R., May, F. E. B., Nicholson, S., Cairns, J., Harris, A. L. & Horne, C. H. W. (1990). Prognostic significance of the estrogen-regulated protein, cathepsin D, in breast cancer. Cancer 65: 265–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isola, J., Weitz, S., Visakorpi, T., Holli, K., Shea, R., Khabbaz, N. & Kallioniemi, O. P. (1993). Cathepsin D expression detected by immunohistochemistry has independent prognostic value in axillary node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 11: 36–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, F., Schmitt, M., Hafter, R., Hollreider, A., Babic, R., Ulm, K., Grössner, W. & Graeff, H. (1990). Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA) antigen is a predictor of early relapse in breast cancer. Fibrinolysis 4: 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joensuu, H., Toikkanen, S. & Isola, J. (1995). Stromal cell cathepsin D expression and long-term survival in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 71: 155–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. L. & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kute, T. E., Shao, Z. M., Sugg, N. K., Long, R. T., Russell, G. B. & Case, L. D. (1992). Cathepsin D as a prognostic indicator for node-negative breast cancer patients using both immunoassays and enzymatic assays. Cancer Res 52: 5198–5203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liaudet, E., Derocq, D., Rochefort, H. & Garcia, M. (1995). Transfected cathepsin D stimulates high density cancer cell growth by inactivating secreted growth inhibitors. Cell Growth Differ 6: 1045–1052.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadji, M., Fresno, M., Nassiri, M., Conner, G., Herrero, A. & Morales, A. R. (1996). Cathepsin D in host stromal cells, but not in tumor cells, is associated with aggressive behavior in node-negative breast cancer. Hum Pathol 27: 890–895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, AEMA, Poller, D. N., Bell, J. A., Galea, M. H., Elston, C. W., Blamey, R. W. & Ellis, I. O. (1995). Cathepsin D in primary breast carcinoma: adverse prognosis is associated with expression in cathepsin D in stromal cells. Breast Cancer Res Treatment 33: 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravdin, P. (1993). Evaluation of cathepsin D as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treatment 24: 219–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravdin, P. M., Tandon, A. K., Allred, C. D. C., Clark, G. M., Fuqua, S. A. W., Hilsenbeck, S. H., Chamness, G. C. & Osborne, C. K. (1994). Cathepsin D by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry: failure to confirm correlations with prognosis in node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12: 467–474.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razumovic, J. J., Stojkovic, R. R., Petrovecki, M. & Gamulin, S. (1997). Correlation of two methods for determination of cathepsin D in breast carcinoma (immunohistochemistry and ELISA in cytosol). Breast Cancer Res Treatment 43: 117–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remmele, W. & Sauer-Manthey, J. (1993). Comparative biochemical and immunohistochemical studies on the cathepsin D content of human breast cancer. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat 422: 467–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, H. (1994). Oestrogens, proteases and breast cancer. From cell lines to clinical applications. Eur J Cancer 10: 1583–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, H. (1996). The prognostic value of cathepsin D in breast cancer. A long road to the clinic. Eur J Cancer 32A: 7–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roger, P., Montcourrier, P., Maudelonde, T., Brouillet, J-P, Pages, A., Laffarque, F. & Rochefort, H. (1994). Cathepsin D immunostaining in paraffin-embedded breast cancer cells and macrophages: correlation with cytosolic assay. Hum Pathol 25: 863–871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saftig, P., Hetman, M., Schmahi, L., Weber, K., Heine, L., Mossman, H., Koster, A., Hess, B., Evers, M., von Figura, K. & Peters, C. (1995). Mice deficient for the lysosomal proteinase cathepsin D exhibit progressive atrophy of the intestinal mucosa and profound destruction of lymphoid cells. EMBO J 14: 3599–3608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spyratos, F., Brouillet, J. P., Defrenne, A., Hacène, K., Rouesse, J., Moudelonde, T., Brunet, M., Andrieu, C., Desplaces, A. & Rochefort, H. (1989). Cathepsin-D: an independent prognostic factor for metastasis of breast cancer. Lancet i: 1115–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, A. K., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., Chirgwin, J. M. & McGuire, W. L. (1990). Cathepsin D and prognosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 332: 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Têtu, B., Brisson, J., Côté, C., Brisson, S., Potvin, D. & Roberge, N. (1993). Prognostic significance of cathepsin D expression in node-positive breast carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study. Int J Cancer 55: 429–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, S. M., Rochefort, H., Garcia, M., Freiss, G., Christensen, I. J., Khalaf, S., Paolucci, F., Pau, B., Rasmussen, B. B. & Rose, C. (1989). Association between high concentrations of Mr 52 000 cathepsin D and poor prognosis in primary human breast cancer. Cancer Res 49: 6008–6014.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vignon, F., Capony, F., Chambon, M., Freiss, G., Garcia, M. & Rochefort, H. (1986). Autocrine growth stimulation of the MCF-7 breast cancer cells by the estrogen-regulated 52 k protein. Endocrinology 118: 1537–1540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, B. R. & Rochefort, H. (1979). Estradiol induced proteins in the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 90: 410–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, B. R. & Rochefort, H. (1980). A secreted glycoprotein induced by estrogen in human breast cancer cell lines. Cell 20: 353–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, B. R. & May, F. E. B. (1996). Cathepsin D and breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A: 15–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Endocrine Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek), Academic Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    J A Foekens, M P Look, J Bolt-de Vries, M E Meijer-van Gelder & J G M Klijn

  2. Department of Statistics, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek), Academic Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    W L J van Putten

Authors
  1. J A Foekens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M P Look
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J Bolt-de Vries
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M E Meijer-van Gelder
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W L J van Putten
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J G M Klijn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foekens, J., Look, M., Vries, Jd. et al. Cathepsin-D in primary breast cancer: prognostic evaluation involving 2810 patients. Br J Cancer 79, 300–307 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690048

Download citation

  • Received: 12 December 1997

  • Revised: 16 April 1998

  • Accepted: 29 April 1998

  • Published: 18 December 1998

  • Issue date: 01 January 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690048

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • cathepsin-D
  • breast cancer
  • breast cancer prognosis
  • multivariate analysis

This article is cited by

  • Endosomes, lysosomes, and the role of endosomal and lysosomal biogenesis in cancer development

    • Jonathan L. Jeger

    Molecular Biology Reports (2020)

  • Immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer with cathepsin D-targeting antibodies

    • Yahya Ashraf
    • Hanane Mansouri
    • Emmanuelle Liaudet-Coopman

    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (2019)

  • Hispolon suppresses metastasis via autophagic degradation of cathepsin S in cervical cancer cells

    • Min-Chieh Hsin
    • Yi-Hsien Hsieh
    • Shun-Fa Yang

    Cell Death & Disease (2017)

  • Post-operative nomogram for predicting freedom from recurrence after surgery in localised breast cancer receiving adjuvant hormone therapy

    • Chafika Mazouni
    • Frédéric Fina
    • Pierre-Marie Martin

    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (2015)

  • Role of cathepsin D activation in major adverse cardiovascular events and new-onset heart failure after STEMI

    • Aylin Hatice Yamac
    • Emrah Sevgili
    • Ahmet Bacaksiz

    Herz (2015)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited