Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 January 1999

The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress

  • A Cull1,
  • E D C Anderson2,
  • S Campbell1,
  • J Mackay2,
  • E Smyth2 &
  • …
  • M Steel2 

British Journal of Cancer volume 79, pages 501–508 (1999)Cite this article

  • 1549 Accesses

  • 148 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly anxious and whether counselling influenced risk estimates and levels of distress. Women (n = 450) at this clinic were more likely to underestimate (39%) than overestimate (14%) their risk. Mean trait anxiety scores were higher than general population data (t = 4.9, n = 1059, P < 0.001) but not significantly different from published data from other screening samples. Overestimators (z = 5.69, P < 0.0001) and underestimators (z = –8.01, P < 0.0001) reported significantly different risk estimates (i.e. increased accuracy) after counselling, but significant inaccuracies persisted. Over- (n = 12) and underestimators (n = 60) were still inaccurate in their risk estimates by a factor of 2 after counselling. Thirty per cent of the sample scored above the cut-off (5/6) for case identification on a screening measure for psychological distress, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). GHQ scores were significantly lower after counselling (t = 3.6, d.f. = 384, P = 0.0004) with no evidence of increasing risk estimate causing increased distress. The risk of distress after counselling was greater for younger women and those who were more distressed at first presentation. The counselling offered was effective in increasing the accuracy of risk perceptions without causing distress to those who initially underestimated their risk. It is worrying that inaccuracies persisted, particularly as the demand for service has since reduced the consultation time offered in this clinic. Further work is needed to evaluate alternative models of service delivery using more sophisticated methods of assessing understanding of risk.

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessment of psychosocial difficulties by genetic clinicians and distress in women at high risk of breast cancer: a prospective study

Article Open access 11 April 2022

How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research

Article Open access 24 August 2022

What do women think about having received their breast cancer risk as part of a risk-stratified NHS Breast Screening Programme? A qualitative study

Article Open access 24 May 2023

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Bottorff, J. L., Ratner, P. A. & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Communicating cancer risk information: the challenges of uncertainty. Patient Education Counselling 33: 67–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claus, E. B., Risch, N. K. & Thomson, W. D. (1991). Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet 48: 232–242.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B., Blaxter, M., Buckle, A., Fenner, N. P., Golding, J., Gore, M., Huppert, F., Nickson, J., Roth, M., Stark, J., Wadsworth, M. & Wichelow, M. (1987). The Health and Lifestyle Survey, Cambridge: Health Promotion Research cited in Goldberg and William (op cit)

  • Cull, A. (1998). Psychosocial implications of Progress in Breast Cancer Genetics: uncertainties and Challenges. Clin Psychol Psychother 5: 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cull, A., Miller, H., Porterfield, T., Mackay, J., Anderson, E. D. C., Steel, C. M. & Elton, R. A. (1998). The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomised evaluation study. Br J Cancer 77: 830–837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick, J. (1985). A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med 4: 87–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. G. R., Burnell, L. D., Hopwood, P. & Howell, A. (1993). Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 67: 612–614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. G. R., Blair, V., Greenhalgh, R., Hopwood, P. & Howell, A. (1994). The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 70: 934–938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield, L. J., Rodway, A. & Baum, M. (1990). What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre?. J Roy Soc Med 83: 547–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, P., Massie, M. J., Kash, K., Gronert, M., Heerdt, A. S., Brown, K., Sullivan, M. D. & Borgen, P. (1996). Perception of breast cancer risk and psychological distress in women attending a surveillance program. PsychoOncology 5: 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (1988). GHQ: A Users Guide to the General Health Questionnaire, NFER-Nelson: Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, N. & Richards, M. P. M. (1997). Understanding Life’s Lottery: an Evaluation of Studies of Genetic Risk Awareness. J Health Psychol 2: 31–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingledew, D. K., Hardy, L., Cooper, C. L. & Jemal, H. (1996). Health behaviours reported as coping strategies: a factor analytical study. Br J Health Psychol 13: 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S. et al (1992). Psychological distress and surveillance behaviours of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 24–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. G., Waal Manning, H. J. & Spears, G. F. (1983). Some norms and reliability data for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Zung Self Rating Depression Scale. Br J Clin Psychol 22: 245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Daly, M., Sands, C. et al (1993). Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 1074–1080.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Kash, K., Stefanek, M. (1994a). Young women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological wellbeing and surveillance behaviour. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Daly, M., Masny, A. et al (1994b). Attitudes about genetic testing for breast–ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 12: 843–850.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Lustbader, E., Rimer, B., Daly, M., Miller, S., Sands, C. & Balshem, A. (1995). Effects of individualised breast cancer risk counselling: a Randomised Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 286–292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S., Watson, M., Waites, B., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S. & Tylee, A. (1996). Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer 74: 482–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Richardson, J. L., Graham, J. W. & Levine, A. (1986). Role of health locus of control beliefs and expectations of treatment in adjustment to cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 51: 443–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and Blunting: Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Styles of Information Seeking Under Threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 52: 345–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T. & Greer, S. (1982). Psychological characteristics of women electing to attend a breast screening clinic. Clin Oncol 8: 113–119.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pharoah, P. D. P. & Mackay, J. (1998). Absolute risk of breast cancer in women at increased risk: a more useful clinical measure than relative risk?. The Breast, (Submitted) Information presented to a Concensus meeting on the management of women with a family history of breast cancer, January 1998, Wellcome Trust: London

  • Pharoah, P. D. P., Day, N. E., Duffy, S., Easton, D. F. & Ponder, B. A. J. (1997). Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 71: 800–809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. & Ponder, M. (1996). Lay understanding of genetics: a test of a hypothesis. J Med Genet 33: 1032–1036.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. (1983). Manual for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp (1995). Stata Statistical Software: Release 4.0, Stata Corporation: College Station, TX

  • Steptoe, A. (1989). An abbreviated version of the Miller Behavioural Style Scale. Br J Clin Psychol 28: 183–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirlaway, K., Fallowfield, L., Nunnerley, H. & Powles, T. (1996). Anxiety in women ‘at risk’ of developing breast cancer. Br J Cancer 73: 1422–1424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K. A. & Wallston, B. S. (1978). evelopment of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales. Health Ed Mono 6: (2) 160–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICRF Medical Oncology Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK

    A Cull & S Campbell

  2. SE Scotland Breast Cancer Genetic Counselling and Screening Clinic, 26 Ardmillan Terrace, Edinburgh, EH11 2JL, UK

    E D C Anderson, J Mackay, E Smyth & M Steel

Authors
  1. A Cull
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E D C Anderson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Campbell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J Mackay
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E Smyth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M Steel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cull, A., Anderson, E., Campbell, S. et al. The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress. Br J Cancer 79, 501–508 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078

Download citation

  • Received: 15 January 1998

  • Revised: 04 June 1998

  • Accepted: 08 July 1998

  • Published: 14 January 1999

  • Issue date: 01 February 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • breast cancer genetics
  • risk counselling
  • psychological distress
  • risk perception

This article is cited by

  • How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research

    • Victoria G. Woof
    • Anthony Howell
    • David P. French

    British Journal of Cancer (2022)

  • Psychiatric symptoms in a Spanish sample with hereditary cancer risk

    • Gema Costa-Requena
    • Mercedes Garcia-Garijo
    • Ángel Segura-Huerta

    Journal of Community Genetics (2022)

  • Perception of Breast Cancer Risk in Over 11,000 Patients During Routine Mammography Exam

    • Baruch Abittan
    • Sarah Pachtman
    • Jonathan Herman

    Journal of Cancer Education (2020)

  • Experiences of Women Who Underwent Predictive BRCA 1/2 Mutation Testing Before the Age of 30

    • Kate Brunstrom
    • Alexandra Murray
    • Marion McAllister

    Journal of Genetic Counseling (2016)

  • A group approach to genetic counselling of cardiomyopathy patients: satisfaction and psychological outcomes sufficient for further implementation

    • Ellen Otten
    • Erwin Birnie
    • Irene M van Langen

    European Journal of Human Genetics (2015)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited