Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
The role of tumour markers in predicting skeletal metastases in breast cancer patients with equivocal bone scintigraphy
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 February 1999

The role of tumour markers in predicting skeletal metastases in breast cancer patients with equivocal bone scintigraphy

  • A Nicolini1,
  • P Ferrari1,
  • A Sagripanti1 &
  • …
  • A Carpi1 

British Journal of Cancer volume 79, pages 1443–1447 (1999)Cite this article

  • 1769 Accesses

  • 43 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

Bone scintigraphy (BS) is commonly performed in the staging and postoperative monitoring of breast cancer. Nevertheless, due to low specificity it often demonstrates hot spots with equivocal interpretation, which may be misleading in the management of these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the value of a serum tumour marker panel in selecting among the patients with equivocal BS those with bone metastases. Between January 1986 and December 1995, 297 breast cancer patients were followed-up after mastectomy with serial determinations of a CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel, BS and liver echography. The tumour marker panel was used to select patients with equivocal BS for examination of suspicious bone areas by further imaging techniques. Up to December 1995, 158 (53%) patients showed an equivocal BS and 47 patients developed bone metastases. In the 158 patients with equivocal BS, prolonged clinical and imaging follow-up over 45 months (mean; range 12–120) was used to ascertain the presence or absence of bone metastases. In these 158 patients the negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the tumour marker panel to predict bone metastases was 97% and 75% respectively. This study shows that in breast cancer patients the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel has a high value in selecting those patients with bone metastases, or at high risk of developing clinically-evident bone metastases, among the large number of subjects with equivocal BS.

Similar content being viewed by others

First prospective data on breast cancer patients from the multicentre italian bone metastasis database

Article Open access 22 February 2021

Bone serves as a transfer station for secondary dissemination of breast cancer

Article Open access 21 April 2023

Identification of the optimal candidates to benefit from surgery and chemotherapy among elderly female breast cancer patients with bone metastases

Article Open access 08 February 2025

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • ASCO Tumor Marker Expert Panel (1996). Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 14: 2843–2877.

  • Bonadonna, G. & Valagussa, P. (1993). Neoplasie della mammella. In Manuale di oncologia medica, Bonadonna G and Robustelli della Cuna G (eds), pp 529–563, Masson: Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, L. K., Porter, B. A., Redmond, JIII, Olson, D. O., Stimac, G. K., Dunning, D. M. & Friedl, K. E. (1988). Early diagnosis of spinal metastases by CT and MR studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12: 423–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuschieri, A. (1973). Urinary hydroxyproline excretion in early and advanced breast cancer – a sequential study. Brit J Surg 60: 800–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuschieri, A. (1977). Urinary hydroxyproline in the management of breast cancer. World J Surg 1: 299–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Del Turco, M. R., Palli, D., Cariddi, A., Ciatto, S., Pacini, P. & Distante, V. (1994). Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. JAMA 271: 1593–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fateh-Moghadam, A. & Stieber, P. (1993). Use of tumour markers in certain solid tumours. In Sensible use of tumour markers, Fateh-Moghadam A, Stieber P (eds), pp 56–57, J Hartmann, Verlag GMBH: Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelman, I. (1991). Bone scanning. In Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 2nd edn, Maisey MN, Britton KE and Gilday DL (eds), pp 131–157. Chapman and Hall Medical: London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galasko, C. S. B. & Doyle, F. H. (1972). The detection of skeletal metastases from mammary carcinoma. A regional comparison between radiology and scintigraphy. Clin Radiol 23: 295–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, F., Dequeker, J., Drochmans, A., Wildiers, J. & Merlevede, M. (1976). Relevance of hydroxyproline excretion to bone metastasis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 34: 279–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, C. E., Pachas, W. N., Pinals, R. S. & Krant, M. J. (1969). Urinary hydroxyproline excretion in patients with cancer. Cancer 24: 382–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Held, P. & Breit, A. (1994). Comparison of CT and MRI methods in diagnosis of tumours of the para- and retropharingeal space and temporal bone. Bildgebung 6: 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, R., Donegan, W., Manoli, R. & Yeh, E. L. (1979). Prognostic value of pretreatment bone scans in breast carcinoma. AJR 132: 877–881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luthgens, M., Schelegel, G., Eklund, G. & Bjorklund, B. (1981). Correlation between activity in breast cancer and CEA, TPA and eighteen common laboratory procedures and the improvement by the combined use of CEA and TPA. Tumour Diagnostik 2: 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. & Warren, S. (1971). Neoplasms. In Pathology, 6th edn. Mosby: St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulopulos, L. A., Dimopoulos, M. A., Smith, T. L., Weber, D. M., Delasalle, K. B., Libshitz, H. I. & Alexanian, R. (1995). Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 13: 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, G. R., Ibbotson, K. J., D’Souza, S. M., Simpson, E. L., Jacobs, J. W. & Martin, T. J. (1984). The hypercalcemia of cancer-clinical implications and pathogenic mechanisms. N Engl J Med 310: 1718–1722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, A., Carpi, A., Di Marco, G., Giuliani, L., Giordani, R. & Palla, S. (1989). A rational postoperative follow-up with carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen and urinary hydroxyproline in breast cancer patients. Cancer 63: 2037–2046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, A., Colombini, C., Luciani, L., Carpi, A. & Giuliani, L. (1991). Evaluation of serum CA 15-3 determination with CEA and TPA in the post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 64: 154–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, A., Carpi, A. & Tibaldi, C. (1992). The patients postoperative management of breast cancer patient: new concepts. In Progress in Clinical Oncology, Carpi A, Sagripanti A and Mittermayer CH (eds), pp 187–203. Sympomed Medical: Munchen

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, A., Anselmi, L., Michelassi, C. & Carpi, A. (1997). Prolonged survival by “early” salvage treatment of breast cancer patients: a retrospective six year study. Br J Cancer 76: 1106–1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. A. (1997). Radioisotope-guided surgical biopsy of suspected osseous metastases. Cancer Control 4: 517–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanal, S. M., Flickinger, F. W., Caudell, M. J. & Sherry, R. M. (1994). Detection of bone marrow involvement in breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 12: 1415–1421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shreve, P. D., Grossman, H. B., Gross, M. D. & Wahl, R. L. (1996). Metastatic prostate cancer: initial findings of PET with 2-deoxy-2-(F-18) fluoro-D-glucose. Radiology 199: 751–756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Touitou, Y., Proust, J., Klinger, E. & Nakache, J. P. (1985). Biological and pathological factors affecting plasma gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase activity in the elderly. Clin Chim Acta 146: 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Virgo, K. S. (1996). The costs of cancer patient follow-up post-treatment. In: ASCO Educational Book, pp 328–329, the American Society of Clinical Oncology: Place

  • White, D. R., Maloney, JJ III, Muss, H. B., Vance, R. P., Barnes, P., Howard, V., Rhyne, L. & Cowan, R. J. (1979). Serum alkaline phosphatase determination-value in the staging of advanced breast cancer. JAMA 242: 1147–1149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Oncological consulting room, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy

    A Nicolini, P Ferrari, A Sagripanti & A Carpi

Authors
  1. A Nicolini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P Ferrari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A Sagripanti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A Carpi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicolini, A., Ferrari, P., Sagripanti, A. et al. The role of tumour markers in predicting skeletal metastases in breast cancer patients with equivocal bone scintigraphy. Br J Cancer 79, 1443–1447 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690230

Download citation

  • Received: 18 February 1998

  • Revised: 22 September 1998

  • Accepted: 14 October 1998

  • Published: 26 February 1999

  • Issue date: 01 March 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690230

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • bone metastases
  • tumour markers
  • equivocal bone scanning

This article is cited by

  • A suggested guiding panel of seromarkers for efficient discrimination between primary and secondary human hepatocarcinoma

    • Nabil Mohie Abdel-Hamid
    • M. M. Abouzied
    • A. S. Gerges

    Tumor Biology (2016)

  • Risk of metastasis among rib abnormalities on bone scans in breast cancer patients

    • Qin Li
    • Zhiqiang Chen
    • Xiaoan Liu

    Scientific Reports (2015)

  • 18F-Fluoride PET/CT is highly effective for excluding bone metastases even in patients with equivocal bone scintigraphy

    • Daniel C. Bortot
    • Bárbara J. Amorim
    • Celso Dario Ramos

    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2012)

  • Could the serial determination of Ca15.3 serum improve the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT? Results from small population with previous breast cancer

    • Laura Evangelista
    • Zora Baretta
    • Giorgio Saladini

    Annals of Nuclear Medicine (2011)

  • Surveillance après traitement de cancer du sein (hors mutation)

    Oncologie (2009)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited