Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
The development of a structured rating schedule (the BAS) to assess skills in breaking bad news
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 April 1999

The development of a structured rating schedule (the BAS) to assess skills in breaking bad news

  • S J Miller1,
  • T Hope2 &
  • D C Talbot3 

British Journal of Cancer volume 80, pages 792–800 (1999)Cite this article

  • 1815 Accesses

  • 47 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

There has been considerable interest in how doctors break bad news, with calls from within the profession and from patients for doctors to improve their communication skills. In order to aid clinical training and assessment of the skills used in breaking bad news there is a need for a reliable, practical and valid, structured rating schedule. Such a rating schedule was compiled from agreed criteria in the literature. Video-taped recordings of simulated consultations breaking bad news were independently assessed by three raters using the schedule and compared to three experts who gave global ratings. The primary outcome measures were internal consistency of the schedule and level of agreement between raters. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93. Agreement between raters using the schedule was moderate to good. The majority of the variation in scores was due to the differences in skills demonstrated in the interviews. The agreement between raters not using the schedule was poor. The BAS provides a simple to use, reliable, and consistent rating schedule for assessing skills used in breaking bad news. It could be a valuable aid to teaching this difficult task.

Similar content being viewed by others

The Brief negative Symptom Scale (BNSS): a systematic review of measurement properties

Article Open access 27 July 2023

Establishment and validation survival prediction models for T1 locally advanced breast cancer after breast conservation surgery versus mastectomy

Article Open access 09 April 2025

Experiences of healthcare professionals returning to work post breast cancer diagnosis in China: A descriptive qualitative study

Article Open access 14 January 2025

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes. Cronbachs alpha. Br Med J 314: 572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, P. & Silman, A. (1992). Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. Br Med J 304: 1491–1494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, P., Silman, A., Black, C., Bernstien, R., Coppock, J., Maddison, P., Sheeran, T., Stevens, C. & Wollheim, F. (1992). Reliability of skin involvement measures in scleroderma. Br J Rheumatol 31: 457–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckman, R. & Kason, Y. (1992). How to Break Bad News – a Protocol for Healthcare Professionals. Toronto University Press: Toronto

  • Burton, M. V. & Parker, R. W. (1997). Psychological aspects of cancer surgery: surgeons’ attitudes and opinions. Psycho-oncology 6: 47–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butow, P. N., Dunn, S. M., Tattersall, M. H. N. & Jones, Q. J. (1995). Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. Br J Cancer 71: 1115–1121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butow, P. N., Kazemi, J. N., Beeney, L. J., Griffin, A., Dunn, S. M. & Tattersall, M. H. N. (1996). When the diagnosis is cancer, patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer 77: 2630–2637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butow, P. N., Maclean, M., Dunn, S. M., Tattersall, M. H. N. & Boyer, M. J. (1997). The dynamics of change: patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8: 857–863.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassileth, B. R., Zupkis, R. V., Sutton Smith, K. & March, V. (1980). Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Annals of internal Medicine 92: 832–836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, A. M. & Jones, A. (1995). Evaluation of a breaking bad news course for medical students. Med Edu 29: 430–435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggly, S., Afonso, N., Rojas, G., Baker, M., Cardozo, L. & Robertson, R. S. (1997). An assessment of Residents’ competence in the delivery of bad news to patients. Acad Med 72: 397–399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield, L. J. (1993). Giving sad and bad news. Lancet 341: 476–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield, L. J. (1995). Psychosocial interventions in cancer. Br Med J 311: 1316–1317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S., Fallowfield, L. J. & Lewis, S. (1996). Doctor–Patient interactions in oncology. Soc Sci Med 42: 1511–1519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, A., Buckman, R. & Kason, Y. (1997). Teaching medical students how to break bad news. Can Med Assoc J 156: 1159–1164.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard, J. H., Dent, T. H. S., Aarons, E. J., Crimlisk, H. L., Smyth-Piggot, P. J. & Nicholls, M. H. N. (1993). Preregistration houseofficers it the Thames regions: changes in quality of training after four years. Br Med J 307: 1176–1179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Girgis, A., Sanson-Fisher, R. W. & McCarthy, W. H. (1997). Communicating with patients: Surgeons’ perceptions of their skills and need for training. Aust NZ J Surg 67: 775–780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GMC (1993). Tomorrow’s Doctors. General Medical Council: London

  • Hamajima, N., Tajima, K., Morshita, M., Hyodo, C., Sakakibara, N., Kawai, C. & Moritaka, S. (1996). Patients’ expectations of information provided at cancer hospitals in Japan. Jpn-J-Clin-Oncol 26: 362–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Maguire, P., Ibbotsen, T., Macleod, R. & Hopwood, P. (1994). Concerns, confiding and psychiatric disorder in newly diagnosed cancer patients: a descriptive study. Psycho-oncology 3: 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalet, A., Earp, J. & Kowlowitz, V. (1992). How well do faculty evaluate the interviewing skills of medical students. J Gen Intern Med 7: 499–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: past, present and future. Psychosom Med 55: 234–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loge, J. H., Kaasa, S. & Hytten, K. (1997). Disclosing the cancer diagnosis: the patients’ experiences. Eur J Cancer 33(6): 878–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, R. (1991). Patients with advanced breast cancer: the nature and disclosure of their concerns. MSc thesis, University of Manchester

  • Maguire, P. & Faulkner, A. (1988). Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions. Br Med J 297: 907–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, P., Fairbairn, S. & Fletcher, C. (1986a). Consultation skills of young doctors: II Most young doctors are bad at giving information. Br Med J 292: 1576–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, P., Fairbairn, S. & Fletcher, C. (1986b). Consultation skills of young doctors: 1. Benefits of feedback training in interviewing as students persist. Br Med J 292: 1573–1576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, G. L., Hebers, J. E., Caplow, M. P., Cooper, G. S., Pangaro, L. N. & Harvey, J. (1992). How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents?. Ann Int Med 117: 757–765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parle, M., Jones, B. & Maguire, P. (1996). Maladaptive coping and effective disorders among cancer patients. Psychol Med 26: 735–744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek, J. T. & Eberhardt, T. L. (1996). Breaking bad news. A review of the literature. JAMA 276: 496–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Physicians (1997). College Report: Improving communication between doctors and patients. J R Coll Phys Lond 3: 258–259.

  • Sell, L., Devlin, B., Bourke, S. J., Munro, N. C., Corris, P. A. & Gibson, G. J. (1993). Communicating the diagnosis of lung cancer. Respir Med 87: 61–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. A. (1995). Effective physician communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 152: 1423–1433.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Wellcome Research Registrar, University of Oxford, The Warneford Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK

    S J Miller

  2. Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Ethox, University of Oxford Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK

    T Hope

  3. University of Oxford, ICRF Medical Oncology Unit, The Churchill Hospital, Headington,, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK

    D C Talbot

Authors
  1. S J Miller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T Hope
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D C Talbot
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, S., Hope, T. & Talbot, D. The development of a structured rating schedule (the BAS) to assess skills in breaking bad news. Br J Cancer 80, 792–800 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690423

Download citation

  • Received: 28 May 1998

  • Revised: 27 October 1998

  • Accepted: 26 November 1998

  • Published: 23 April 1999

  • Issue date: 01 May 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690423

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • breaking bad news
  • communication skills
  • assessment
  • cancer

This article is cited by

  • Development and preliminary evaluation of a communication skills training programme for hospital physicians by a specialized palliative care service: the ‘Teach to Talk’ programme

    • S. Tanzi
    • L. De Panfilis
    • S. Di Leo

    BMC Medical Education (2020)

  • Social worker assessment of bad news delivery by emergency medicine residents: a novel direct-observation milestone assessment

    • Alice Ann Min
    • Karen Spear-Ellinwood
    • Suzanne Michelle Rhodes

    Internal and Emergency Medicine (2016)

  • Counseling for personal care options at neonatal end of life: a quantitative and qualitative parent survey

    • Emily Shelkowitz
    • Sharon L. Vessella
    • Beatrice E. Lechner

    BMC Palliative Care (2015)

  • The Influence of Distress on Knowledge Transfer for Men Newly Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer

    • R. B. Hovey
    • K. E. S. Cuthbertson
    • C. Scott

    Journal of Cancer Education (2012)

  • Überbringen schlechter Nachrichten in der ärztlichen Praxis

    • R. Frank

    Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde (2011)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited