Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Minimal breast cancer: evaluation of histology and biological marker expression
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 June 1999

Minimal breast cancer: evaluation of histology and biological marker expression

  • E A Dublin1,
  • R R Millis1,
  • P Smith1 &
  • …
  • L G Bobrow2 

British Journal of Cancer volume 80, pages 1608–1616 (1999)Cite this article

  • 516 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

Ninety-eight minimal breast cancers (MBCs) diagnosed between 1975 and 1990, and all originally considered to be invasive were found, on review, to form three groups: (a) 28 predominantly invasive carcinomas ≤10 mm (‘predominant invasive’); (b) 48 predominantly ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions with definite foci of invasion each ≤10 mm (‘predominant DCIS’); and (c) 22 DCIS without evidence of invasion (‘pure DCIS’). Tumour histology and immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, c-erbB2, p53, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Bcl-2 were compared. The major finding was the contrasting features in the two invasive groups, with significant differences in their extent of invasion (P < 0.0001), tumour grade (P = 0.03), DCIS type (P = 0.008) and in marker expression. In the predominant invasive group, the infiltrative component was usually greater than 5 mm, low-grade and associated with well-differentiated DCIS. Expression of Ki-67, c-erbB2 and p53 was generally low, and that of ER, PR and Bcl-2 high. The predominant DCIS group in contrast had a much smaller, commonly high-grade, invasive component, usually with poorly differentiated DCIS and the reverse pattern of marker expression. Although not significant, survival of patients in the predominant invasive group was slightly better. These findings suggest that invasive MBCs should perhaps be treated as separate entities, in order to aid more appropriate selection of treatment.

Similar content being viewed by others

Gene expression signatures of individual ductal carcinoma in situ lesions identify processes and biomarkers associated with progression towards invasive ductal carcinoma

Article Open access 13 June 2022

Genomic analysis defines clonal relationships of ductal carcinoma in situ and recurrent invasive breast cancer

Article Open access 09 June 2022

Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance

Article Open access 03 April 2024

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Ackerman, L. V. & Katzenstein, A. L. (1977). The concept of minimal breast cancer and the pathologist’s role in the diagnosis of ‘early carcinoma’. Cancer 39: 2755–2763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allred, D. C., Clark, G. M., Molina, R., Tandon, A. K., Schnitt, S. J., Gilchrist, K. W., Osborne, C. K., Tormey, D. C. & McGuire, W. L. (1992). Overexpression of HER-2/neu and its relationship with other prognostic factors change during the progression of in situ to invasive breast cancer. Hum Pathol 23: 974–979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnesson, L-G, Smeds, S. & Fagerberg, G. (1994). Recurrence-free survival in patients with small breast cancers. An analysis of cancers 10 mm or less detected clinically and by screening. Eur J Surg 160: 271–276.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. M., Bartkova, J., Camplejohn, R. S., Gullick, W. J., Smith, P. J. & Millis, R. R. (1992). Overexpression of the c-erbB-2 oncoprotein: why does this occur more frequently in ductal carcinoma in situ than in invasive mammary carcinoma and is this of prognostic significance?. Eur J Cancer 28: 644–648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. M., Dublin, E. A., Fisher, C. J., Levison, D. A. & Millis, R. R. (1993). Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein in mammary carcinoma: an important new independent indicator of prognosis? Hum Pathol 24: 469–476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, S. A., Doberneck, S. A., Sternlicht, M. D., Grossman, D. A. & Love, S. M. (1997). ‘Revertant’ DCIS in human axillary breast carcinoma metastases. J Pathol 183: 188–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkova, J., Barnes, D. M. & Millis, R. R. (1990). Immunohistochemical demonstration of c-erbB-2 protein in mammary ductal carcinoma in situ. Hum Pathol 21: 1164–1167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, C. O. C., McDonald, C., Salter, D. M., Chetty, U. & Anderson, T. J. (1993). Non-invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: the relevance of histologic categorization. Hum Pathol 24: 16–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, L. G., Happerfield, L. C., Gregory, W. M., Springall, R. G. & Millis, R. R. (1994). The classification of ductal carcinoma in situ and its association with biological markers. Semin Diagn Pathol 11: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston, C. W. & Ellis, I. O. (1991). Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19: 403–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallager, H. S. & Martin, J. E. (1971). An orientation to the concept of minimal breast cancer. Cancer 28: 1505–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, N. S. & Murphy, T. (1996). Intraductal carcinoma associated with invasive carcinoma of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 106: 312–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. & Schnitt, S. J. (1990). Is radiotherapy as curative as mastectomy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19: 1091–1092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R., Peterse, J. L., Millis, R. R., Eusebi, V., Faverley, D., van de Vijver, M. J. & Zafrani, B. (1994). Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 11: 167–180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joensuu, H. & Toikkanen, S. (1991). Prognosis of breast cancer with small primary tumor (pT1). Acta Oncol 30: 793–796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. L. & Meier, P. (1958). Non-parametic estimation from incomplete observations. Am Stat Assoc J 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagios, M. D., Margolin, F. R., Westdahl, P. R. & Rose, M. R. (1989). Mammographically detected duct carcinoma in situ. Frequency of local recurrence following tylectomy and prognostic effect of nuclear grade on local recurrence. Cancer 63: 618–624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lampejo, O. T., Barnes, D. M., Smith, P. & Millis, R. R. (1994). Evaluation of infiltrating carcinomas with a DCIS component: correlation of the histologic type of the in situ component with grade of the infiltrating component. Semin Diagn Pathol 11: 215–222.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovekin, C., Ellis, I. O., Locker, A., Robertson, J. F. R., Bell, J., Nicholson, R., Gullick, W. J., Elston, C. W. & Blamey, R. W. (1991). c-erbB-2 oncoprotein expression in primary and advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 63: 439–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, L., Kerkvliet, N., Doig, G. & O’Malley, F. P. (1997). Relationship of a new histological categorization of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with size and the immunohistochemical expression of p53, c-erbB2, bcl-2, and Ki-67. Hum Pathol 28: 974–979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millis, R. R. (1996). Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol 3: 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millis, R. R., Bobrow, L. G. & Barnes, D. M. (1996). Immunohistochemical evaluation of biological markers in mammary carcinoma in situ: correlation with morphological features and recently proposed schemes for histological classification. Breast 5: 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriya, T. & Silverberg, S. G. (1994). Intraductal carcinoma (ductal carcinoma in situ) of the breast. Cancer 74: 2972–2978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, I., Cole, B., Wanebo, H., Bland, K. & Chang, H. (1998). Prognostic analysis of survival in small breast cancers. J Am Coll Surg 186: 562–569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, B., Gusterson, B., Jadayel, D., O’Hare, M., Anbazhagan, R., Jayatilake, H., Ebbs, S., Micklem, K., Gelber, R., Reed, R., Senn, H. J., Goldhirsch, A. & Dyer, M. J. S. (1994). Expression of Bcl-2 in primary breast cancer and its correlation with tumour phenotype. Ann Oncol 5: 409–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patchefsky, A. S., Schwartz, G. F., Finkelstein, S. D., Prestipino, A., Sohn, S. E., Singer, J. S. & Feig, S. (1989). Heterogeneity of intraductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 63: 731–741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Querzoli, P., Albonico, G., Ferretti, S., Rinaldi, R., Beccati, D., Corcione, S., Indelli, M. & Nenci, I. (1998). Modulation of biomarkers in minimal breast carcinoma: a model for human breast carcinoma progression. Cancer 83: 89–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, D. & Lane, W. W. (1990). Node-negative minimal invasive breast cancer patients are not candidates for routine systemic adjuvant therapy. Cancer 66: 199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitt, S. J., Silen, W., Sadowsky, N. L., Connolly, J. L. & Harris, J. R. (1988). Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. N Engl J Med 318: 898–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. A., Lagios, M. D., Axelsson, K., Rogers, L. W., Anderson, T. & Page, D. L. (1997). Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: reproducibility of histological subtype analysis. Hum Pathol 28: 967–973.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H. P., Oelmann, A., Anton, H. W. & Diel, I. J. (1994). Metastatic potential of small and minimally invasive breast carcinomas. Virchows Arch 425: 237–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sobin, L. H. & Wittekind, C. H. (1997). Breast tumours. In TNM Classification of Tumours, Sobin LH & Wittekind CH (eds), pp. 125–127. Wiley Liss: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabàr, L., Fagerberg, G., Day, N. E., Duffy, S. W. & Kitchin, R. M. (1992). Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results of screening. Lancet 339: 412–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiana, M. & Koscielny, S. (1991). Natural history of human breast cancer: recent data and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 18: 125–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Dongen, J., Holland, R., Peterse, J. L., Fentiman, I. S., Lagios, M. D., Millis, R. R. & Recht, A. (1992). Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast; second EORTC consensus meeting. Eur J Cancer 28: 626–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veronese, S. M. & Maisano, C. (1996). Comparative prognostic value of Ki-67 and MIB-1 proliferative indices in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 16: 2717–2722.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hedley Atkins/ICRF Breast Pathology Laboratory, Guy’s Hospital, 3rd Floor, Thomas Guy House, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    E A Dublin, R R Millis & P Smith

  2. Histopathology Department, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK

    L G Bobrow

Authors
  1. E A Dublin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R R Millis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P Smith
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L G Bobrow
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dublin, E., Millis, R., Smith, P. et al. Minimal breast cancer: evaluation of histology and biological marker expression. Br J Cancer 80, 1608–1616 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690570

Download citation

  • Received: 06 August 1998

  • Revised: 12 January 1999

  • Accepted: 27 January 1999

  • Published: 25 June 1999

  • Issue date: 01 July 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690570

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • minimal breast cancer
  • differentiation
  • marker expression
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited