Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Population pharmacokinetics in phase I drug development: a phase I study of PK1 in patients with solid tumours
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 August 1999

Population pharmacokinetics in phase I drug development: a phase I study of PK1 in patients with solid tumours

  • A H Thomson1,
  • P A Vasey2,
  • L S Murray1,
  • J Cassidy4,
  • D Fraier3,
  • E Frigerio3 &
  • …
  • C Twelves2 

British Journal of Cancer volume 81, pages 99–107 (1999)Cite this article

  • 1185 Accesses

  • 77 Citations

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

Doxorubicin pharmacokinetics were determined in 33 patients with solid tumours who received intravenous doses of 20–320 mg m–2 HPMA copolymer bound doxorubicin (PK1) in a phase I study. Since assay constraints limited the data at lower doses, conventional analysis was not feasible and a ‘population approach’ was used. Bound concentrations were best described by a biexponential model and further analyses revealed a small influence of dose or weight on V1 but no identifiable effects of age, body surface area, renal or hepatic function. The final model was: clearance (Q) 0.194 l h–1; central compartment volume (V1) 4.48 × (1+0.00074 × dose (mg)) l; peripheral compartment volume (V2) 7.94 l; intercompartmental clearance 0.685 l h–1. Distribution and elimination half-lives had median estimates of 2.7 h and 49 h respectively. Free doxorubicin was present at most sampling times with concentrations around 1000 times lower than bound doxorubicin values. Data were best described using a biexponential model and the following parameters were estimated: apparent clearance 180 l h–1; apparent V1 (l) 1450 × (1+0.0013 × dose (mg)), apparent V2 (l) 21 300 × (1–0.0013 × dose (mg)) × (1+2.95 × height (m)) and apparent Q 6950 l h–1. Distribution and elimination half-lives were 0.13 h and 85 h respectively.

Similar content being viewed by others

Population pharmacokinetics of the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in patients with multiple tumor types and model-informed dosing strategy

Article 05 November 2020

Reexamining the effects of drug loading on the in vivo performance of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin

Article 16 October 2023

Dose escalation and expansion cohorts in patients with advanced breast cancer in a Phase I study of the CDK7-inhibitor samuraciclib

Article Open access 24 July 2023

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Amantea, MA, Forrest, A, Northfelt, DW & Mamelok, R (1997). Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. Clin Pharmacol Ther 61: 301–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, SL, Sheiner, LB & Boeckmann, AJ (1994). NONMEM IV User’s Guide, Parts I–VI, NONMEM Project Group, University of California, San Francisco

  • Bronchud, MH, Margison, JM, Howell, A, Lind, M, Lucas, SB & Wilkinson, PM (1990). Comparative pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 25: 435–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, R, Vivier, N, Vergniol, JC, DePhillips, SL, Montay, G & Sheiner, LB (1996). A population pharmacokinetic model for taxotere: model building and validation. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 24: 153–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chabot, GG, Abigerges, D, Catimel, G, Culine, S, Deforni, R, Extra, JM, Mahjoubi, H, Herait, P, Armand, JP, Bugat, R, Clavel, M & Marty, ME (1995). Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during Phase I trials. Ann Oncol 6: 141–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatelut, E, Canal, P, Brunner, V, Chevreau, C, Pujol, A, Boneu, A, Roche, H, Houin, G & Bugat, R (1995). Prediction of carboplatin clearance from standard morphological and biological patient characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 573–580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft, DW & Gault, MH (1976). Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16: 31–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, NA, Twelves, CJ, Gillies, H, James, CA, Harper, PG & Rubens, RD (1995). Gender affects doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in patients with normal liver biochemistry. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 36: 473–476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R, Cable, HC, Lloyd, JH, Rejmanova, P & Kopecek, J (1982). Degradation of side chains of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) copolymers by lysosomal thioproteinases. Bioscience Rep 2: 1041–1046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraier, D, Frigerio, E, Pianezzola, E, Strolin Benedetti, M, Cassidy, J & Vasey, P (1995). A sensitive procedure for the quantitation of free and N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide polymer-bound doxorubicin (PK1) and some of its metabolites, 13-dihydrodoxorubicin, 13-dihydrodoxorubicine and doxorubicinone, in human plasma and urine by reversed-phase HPLC with fluorimetric detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal 13: 625–633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet, J-M, Bressolle, F, Galtier, M, Bourrier, M, Donadio, D, Jourdan, J & Rossi, J-F (1996). Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol: intra- and inter-individual variations of pharmacokinetic parameters. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27: 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodrell, DI, Reyno, LM, Sridhara, R, Eisenberger, MA, Tkaczuk, KH, Zuhowski, EG, Sinibaldi, VJ, Novak, MJ & Egorin, MJ (1994). Suramin: development of a population pharmacokinetic model and its use with intermittent short infusions to control plasma drug concentration in patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 12: 166–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Launay Iliadis, MC, Bruno, R, Cosson, V, Vergniol, JC, Oulidaissa, D, Marty, M, Clavel, M, Aapro, M, Lebail, N & Iliadis, A (1995). Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during Phase I studies using nonlinear mixed effect modelling and nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37: 47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, H & Matsumura, Y (1989). Tumoritropic and lymphotropic principles of macromolecular drugs. CRC Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Sys 6: 193–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura, Y & Maeda, H (1986). A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy; mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent SMANCS. Cancer Res 46: 6387–6392.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, HL, Graham, MA, Aamdal, S, Setanoians, A, Groot, Y & Lund, B EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group (1996). Phase I pharmacokinetics and limited sampling strategies for the bioreductive alkylating drug EO9. Eur J Cancer 32A: 1518–1522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L, Chatelut, E, Chevreau, C, Tranchand, B, Lochon, I, Bachaud, JM, Pujol, A, Houin, G, Bugat, R & Canal, P (1998). Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 41: 125–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piscitelli, SC, Rodvold, KA, Rushing, DA & Tewksbury, DA (1993). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin in patients with small cell lung cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther 53: 555–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyno, LM, Egorin, MJ, Eisenberger, MA, Sinibaldi, VJ, Zuhowski, EG & Sridhara, R (1995). J Clin Oncol 13: 2187–2195.

  • Samara, E & Granneman, R (1997). Role of population pharmacokinetics in drug development. A pharmaceutical industry perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet 32: 294–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, RC & Cohen, AF (1996). Estimating impossible curves using NONMEM. Br J Clin Pharmacol 42: 283–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, SE, Holford, NHG & McLachlan, AJ (1998). Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: an underutilised resource. Drug Inf J 32: 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner, LB, Rosenberg, B & Marathe, VV (1977). Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 5: 445–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuh, L, Beal, S, Davidian, M, Harrison, F, Hester, A, Kowalski, K, Vonesh, E & Wolfinger, R (1994). Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic methodology and applications: a bibliography. Biometrics 50: 566–575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, PA, Kaye, SB, Morrison, R, Twelves, C, Wilson, P, Duncan, R, Thomson, AH, Murray, L, Hilditch, TE, Murray, T, Burtles, S, Fraier, D, Frigero, E & Cassidy, J (1999). Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of PK1 (HPMA CO-Polymer doxorubicin); first member of a new class of chemotherapeutic agents – drug-polymer conjugates. Clin Cancer Res 5: 83–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, University of Glasgow Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, UK

    A H Thomson & L S Murray

  2. CRC Department of Medical Oncology Beatson Oncology Centre, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, UK

    P A Vasey & C Twelves

  3. Bioanalytical Laboratory Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism Department, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Nerviano, Italy

    D Fraier & E Frigerio

  4. Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK

    J Cassidy

Authors
  1. A H Thomson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P A Vasey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L S Murray
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J Cassidy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D Fraier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E Frigerio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C Twelves
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomson, A., Vasey, P., Murray, L. et al. Population pharmacokinetics in phase I drug development: a phase I study of PK1 in patients with solid tumours. Br J Cancer 81, 99–107 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690657

Download citation

  • Received: 19 November 1998

  • Revised: 25 March 1999

  • Accepted: 12 April 1999

  • Published: 13 August 1999

  • Issue date: 01 September 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690657

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • PK1-doxorubicin
  • solid tumours
  • population pharmacokinetics

This article is cited by

  • The expanding role of prodrugs in contemporary drug design and development

    • Jarkko Rautio
    • Nicholas A. Meanwell
    • Michael J. Hageman

    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2018)

  • Application of population pharmacokinetic modeling in early clinical development of the anticancer agent E7820

    • Ron J. Keizer
    • Miren K. Zamacona
    • Alwin D. R. Huitema

    Investigational New Drugs (2009)

  • Virotherapy of Ovarian Cancer With Polymer-cloaked Adenovirus Retargeted to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

    • Joanne Morrison
    • Simon S Briggs
    • Leonard W Seymour

    Molecular Therapy (2008)

  • Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer

    • Mark E. Davis
    • Zhuo Chen
    • Dong M. Shin

    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2008)

  • Polymer conjugates as anticancer nanomedicines

    • Ruth Duncan

    Nature Reviews Cancer (2006)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited