Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

British Journal of Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. british journal of cancer
  3. regular article
  4. article
Colorectal cancer after a negative Haemoccult II® test and programme sensitivity after a first round of screening: The experience of the Department of Calvados (France)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Regular Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 August 1999

Colorectal cancer after a negative Haemoccult II® test and programme sensitivity after a first round of screening: The experience of the Department of Calvados (France)

  • V Bouvier1,
  • G Launoy1,
  • C Herbert1,
  • H Lefevre1,
  • J Maurel1,2 &
  • …
  • M Gignoux1,2 

British Journal of Cancer volume 81, pages 305–309 (1999)Cite this article

  • 426 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

This article has been updated

Summary

Colorectal cancers emerging after a negative Haemoccult II® are described in the context of a first round of mass screening in the Department of Calvados (France), from April 1991 to the end of December 1994. People with a cancer occurring after a negative test until 31 December 1995 were identified by a local cancer registry. Incidence was calculated and the programme sensitivity was estimated. The incidence of cancer emerging after a negative test was 57.7 per 100 000, i.e. half of the calculated incidence in the reference group (141.6 per 100 000). These cancers did not differ from those of either the non-responder or reference groups, in particular for the stage of extension. The programme sensitivity was globally higher than that estimated in European trials: 77.2, 66.3 and 55.9%, 1, 2 and 3 years after the test respectively. Programme sensitivity was higher for distal colon cancer 1 year after the test, which is probably due to the relatively slow growth of this subsite.

Similar content being viewed by others

Diagnostic performance of a faecal immunochemical test for patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer in primary care: an evaluation in the South West of England

Article Open access 19 January 2021

Inequalities in treatment among patients with colon and rectal cancer: a multistate survival model using data from England national cancer registry 2012–2016

Article Open access 23 September 2023

Exploring the impact of stage and tumor site on colorectal cancer survival: Bayesian survival modeling

Article Open access 21 February 2024

Article PDF

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  • Allison, JE, Feldman, R & Tekawa, IS (1990). Hemoccult screening in detecting colorectal neoplasm: sensitivity, specificity and predicting value. Ann Intern Med 112: 328–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benhamiche, AM, Faivre, J, Menegoz, F & Grosclaude, P (1997). Les cancers digestifs en France à l’aube de l’an 2000. Hepato-Gastro 4: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, TR, Ederer, F & Mandel, JS (1997). Faecal occult blood screening in the Minnesota study: sensitivity of the screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 1440–1448.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes, CE (1932). The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 35: 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faivre, J, Grosclaude, P, Launoy, G, Arveux, P, Raverdy, N, Menegoz, F, Schaffer, P, Daures, JP & De Vathaire, F (1997). Les cancers digestifs en France. Distribution géographique et estimation de l’incidence nationale. Gastroentérol Clin Biol 21: 174–180.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, JD, Chamberlain, JO, Robinson, MH, Moss, SM, Amar, SS, Balfour, TW, James, PD & Mangham, CM (1996). Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348: 1472–1477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kronborg, O, Fenger, C, Sonderaard, O, Pedersen, KM & Olsen, J (1987). Initial mass screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test. Scand J Gastroenterol 22: 677–686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kronborg, O, Fenger, C, Olsen, J, Bech, K & Sonderaard, O (1989). Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test. A prospective randomised study at Funen, Denmark. Scand J Gastroenterol 24: 599–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kronborg, O, Fenger, C, Olsen, J, Jorgensen, OD & Sondergaard, O (1996). Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348: 1467–1471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Launoy, G, Herbert, C, Reaud, JM, Thezee, Y, Tichet, J, Maurel, J, Ollivier, V, Pegulu, L, Caces, E, Valla, A & Gignoux, M (1995). Haemoccult test properties according to type and number of positive slides in mass screening for colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 72: 1043–1046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Launoy, G, Herbert, C, Vallee, JP, Desoubeaux, N, Reaud, JM, Ollivier, V, Bouvier, V, Flachs, A, Arsene, D, Valla, A & Gignoux, M (1996). Le dépistage de masse du cancer colorectal en France. Expérience auprès de 165.000 personnes dans le Calvados. Gastroentérol Clin Biol 20: 228–236.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Launoy, G, Smith, TC, Duffy, WS & Bouvier, V (1997). Colorectal cancer mass-screening: estimation of faecal occult blood test sensitivity, taking into account cancer mean sojourn time. Int J Cancer 73: 220–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, JS, Bond, JH, Church, TR, Snover, DC, Bradely, MB, Schuman, LM & Ederer, F (1993). Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for faecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 328: 1365–1371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, MH, Moss, SM, Hardcastle, JD, Whynes, DK, Chamberlain, J & Mangham, CM (1995). Effect of retesting with dietary restriction in Haemoccult screening for colorectal cancer. J Med Screen 2: 41–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Registre des Tumeurs Digestives du Calvados, CJF INSERM 96-03, Faculté de Médecine, Avenue de Côte de nacre, Caen cedex, 14032, France

    V Bouvier, G Launoy, C Herbert, H Lefevre, J Maurel & M Gignoux

  2. Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU, Avenue de Côte de nacre, Caen cedex, 14033, France

    J Maurel & M Gignoux

Authors
  1. V Bouvier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G Launoy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C Herbert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H Lefevre
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J Maurel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M Gignoux
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouvier, V., Launoy, G., Herbert, C. et al. Colorectal cancer after a negative Haemoccult II® test and programme sensitivity after a first round of screening: The experience of the Department of Calvados (France). Br J Cancer 81, 305–309 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6990692

Download citation

  • Received: 07 July 1998

  • Revised: 25 March 1999

  • Accepted: 12 April 1999

  • Published: 27 August 1999

  • Issue date: 01 September 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6990692

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • colorectal cancer
  • screening
  • false-negative test
  • Haemoccult II®
  • programme sensitivity
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Special Issues
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

British Journal of Cancer (Br J Cancer)

ISSN 1532-1827 (online)

ISSN 0007-0920 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited